• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • Investments
    • SES RP3

    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • About
  • Download
  • Data Portal
  • Publications
  1. Safety
  • Year report
    • RP3
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020 ✓

  • Finland
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Safety occurrences
      • Runway incursions
      • Separation minima infringements
      • Occurrences reporting
    • ASDRS

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Safety - Finland

PRB monitoring

▪ ANS Finland achieved the RP3 EoSM targets in four management objectives and must improve in only one area: safety risk management. According to its 2019 draft performance plan, ANS Finland should have achieved the RP3 targets in 2020.

▪ The reason for not achieving the target on safety risk management is under assessment by the Finnish Transport and Communications Agency. No circumstances have been identified as of yet that should prevent ANS Finland from reaching the target.

▪ Compared to the maturity achieved at the end of RP2, the EoSM performance has remained stable as ANS was only deficient in safety risk management in 2019. ANS Finland has two out of three EoSM questions to improve on safety risk management, which should be feasible during RP3.

▪ Finland recorded good performances with respect to safety occurrences. Lower rates of both SMIs and RIs were achieved in 2020 compared with 2019, although SMI performance was higher than the Union-wide average.

▪ ANS Finland should improve its SMS by implementing automated safety data recording systems.

Effectiveness of Safety Management (EoSM) (KPI#1)

Focus on EoSM

Four out of five EoSM components of the ANSP meet already the 2024 target level. Only the component “Safety Risk Management” is below 2024 target level. Improvements in safety risk management are still expected during RP3 to achieve 2024 targets.

Detailed information on Safety performance monitoring for the year 2020 are included in Performance Review Body Monitoring Report 2020, Annex III – Safety report

Safety occurrences

Rate of runway incursions (RIs) (PI#1)

Rate of RIs per 100,000 airport movements - Finland
# Airport name APT movements Number of RI Rate RI per 100,000
1 Helsinki - Vantaa 74,344 1 1.35
Focus on runway incursions

Detailed information on Safety performance monitoring for the year 2020 are included in Performance Review Body Monitoring Report 2020, Annex III – Safety report

Rate of separation minima infringements (SMIs) (PI#2)

Rate of SMI with ANS contribution per 100,000 flight hours
# ANSP
Flight hours
Number of SMIs
Rate of SMI per 100,000 flight hours
% variation in rate of SMIs
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
1 Fintraffic ANS 57,321 NA NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA NA 0.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Focus on separation minima

Detailed information on Safety performance monitoring for the year 2020 are included in Performance Review Body Monitoring Report 2020, Annex III – Safety report

Quality of occurences reporting

Detailed information on Safety performance monitoring for the year 2020 are included in Performance Review Body Monitoring Report 2020, Annex III – Safety report

Use of automated safety data recording system (ASDRS) (PI#3)

Use of automated safety data recording system - 2020
For RIs For SMIs
  ✘   ✘

Detailed information on Safety performance monitoring for the year 2020 are included in Performance Review Body Monitoring Report 2020, Annex III – Safety report

 
  • © European Union, 2025

  • Disclaimer

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission