• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • About
  • Download
  • Publications
  1. Safety
  • Year report
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020 ✓

  • Finland
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Occurrences

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Safety - Finland

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ ANS Finland achieved the RP3 EoSM targets in four management objectives and must improve in only one area: safety risk management. According to its 2019 draft performance plan, ANS Finland should have achieved the RP3 targets in 2020.

▪ The reason for not achieving the target on safety risk management is under assessment by the Finnish Transport and Communications Agency. No circumstances have been identified as of yet that should prevent ANS Finland from reaching the target.

▪ Compared to the maturity achieved at the end of RP2, the EoSM performance has remained stable as ANS was only deficient in safety risk management in 2019. ANS Finland has two out of three EoSM questions to improve on safety risk management, which should be feasible during RP3.

▪ Finland recorded good performances with respect to safety occurrences. Lower rates of both SMIs and RIs were achieved in 2020 compared with 2019, although SMI performance was higher than the Union-wide average.

▪ ANS Finland should improve its SMS by implementing automated safety data recording systems.

Effectiveness of Safety Management (EoSM) (KPI#1)

Focus on EoSM

Four out of five EoSM components of the ANSP meet already the 2024 target level. Only the component “Safety Risk Management” is below 2024 target level. Improvements in safety risk management are still expected during RP3 to achieve 2024 targets.

Occurrences - Rate of runway incursions (RIs) (PI#1) & Rate of separation minima infringements (SMIs) (PI#2)

 
  • © European Union, 2024

  • Disclaimer

  • [email protected]

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission