• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • About
  • Download
  • Publications
  1. Safety
  • Year report
    • 2023
    • 2022 ✓
    • 2021
    • 2020

  • Finland
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Occurrences

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Safety - Finland

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Fintraffic ANS achieved the RP3 EoSM targets in four management objectives and must improve in only one area: Safety risk management, which is currently under the review of the Finnish Transport and Communications Agency.

▪ Finland recorded a stable number of safety occurrences, with a lower rate of runway incursions and a decrease in the rate of separation minima infringements. Both rates were below the Union-wide average.

▪ Fintraffic ANS could improve its safety management by implementing automated safety data recording systems.

Effectiveness of Safety Management (EoSM) (KPI#1)

Focus on EoSM

Four out of five EoSM components of the ANSP meet the RP3 target level. No improvements were observed over 2022, but only “Safety Risk Management” component is below RP3 target level with three questions to improve during RP3 to achieve RP3 target. IMPORTANT: EASA/European Commission did not receive the verified questionnaire from the NSA on time. This is an important step to receive confirmation that the self-evaluated questionnaire by the ANSP has been actually verified. It should be sent in due time to allow proper and timely drafting of the Monitoring Report.

Occurrences - Rate of runway incursions (RIs) (PI#1) & Rate of separation minima infringements (SMIs) (PI#2)

 
  • © European Union, 2024

  • Disclaimer

  • [email protected]

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission