• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • Investments
    • SES RP3

    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • About
  • Download
  • Data Portal
  • Publications
  1. Environment
  • Year report
    • RP3
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022 ✓
    • 2021
    • 2020

  • Poland
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Safety occurrences
      • Runway incursions
      • Separation minima infringements
      • Occurrences reporting
    • ASDRS

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ - Poland EPWA
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ - Poland Others
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Environment - Poland

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Poland achieved a KEA performance of 4.79% compared to its target of 1.65% and did not contribute positively towards achieving the Union-wide target. KEA worsened by 2.46 p.p. compared to 2021.

▪ SCR and KEP were at the highest levels seen in the past five years.

▪ The NSA states that the worsening environmental performance was largely due to external factors linked to the geopolitical situation (Belarus and Ukraine), leading to route extensions and increased military activities. Other factors include weather and user preferences.

▪ The share of CDO flights decreased by 8.23% compared to 2021.

▪ During 2022, additional time in terminal airspace increased from 1.05 to 1.27 min/flight, while additional taxi out time increased from 2.11 to 2.28 min/flight.

En route performance

Horizontal flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) (KPI#1), of the last filed flight plan (KEP) (PI#1) & shortest constrained route (SCR) (PI#2)

Terminal performance

Additional taxi-out time (AXOT) (PI#3) & Arrival Sequencing and Metering Area (ASMA) time (PI#4)

Focus on ASMA & AXOT

AXOT

Additional taxi-out times at Warsaw (EPWA; 2019: 3.43 min/dep.; 2020: 1.99 min/dep.; 2021: 2.11 min/dep.; 2022: 2.28 min/dep.) slightly increased once more, although remained under the SES average for 2022 (2.52 min/dep.).

For information on measures implemented over 2020-2021, the Polish monitoring report refers to the respective Annual Monitoring Reports. No other measured for 2022 is mentioned.

ASMA

Additional times in the terminal airspace of Warsaw (EPWA; 2019: 2.09 min/arr.; 2020: 1.21 min/arr.; 2021: 1.05 min/arr.; 2022: 1.27 min/arr.) in 2022 increased exceeding the SES average of 1.06 min/arr.

For information on measures implemented over 2020-2021, the Polish monitoring report refers to the respective Annual Monitoring Reports. For 2022, the monitoring report mentions the following implementation: RNAV 1 in TMA Operations – RNAV1 SID and STAR is implemented – 1Q 2022.

Share of arrivals applying continuous descent operations (CDOs) (PI#5)

Focus CDOs

All airports have shares of CDO flights (well) above the overall RP3 value in 2022 (29.0%) except for Rzeszów-Jasionka (EPRZ - 26.7%).
Gdańsk im. Lecha Wałęsy, Kraków-Balice, Poznań-Ławica and Zielona Góra-Babimost had (slightly) higher values than in 2021 (EPGD: +1.3 percentage points; EPKK: +0.7 percentage points; EPPO: +0.1 percentage points; EPZG: + 1.8 percentage points) while the values for the other airports decreased (between -21.7 and -1.0 percentage points).

According to the Polish monitoring report: For information on measures implemented over 2020-2021 please see the respective Annual Monitoring Reports. RNP 1 in TMA Operations - RNP-1 are already implemented for EPBY, EPRA, EPRZ, EPLL, EPLB, EPSY, EPSC (DEP&ARR) EPZG (ARR). PANSA operational procedures allows the CCO/CDO operations in maximumal possible extent, ATCOs are trained for this kind of operations as one of the work-standards being regularly monitored and assessed.

Airport level
Airport
Additional taxi-out time (PI#3)
Additional ASMA time (PI#4)
Share of arrivals applying CDO (PI#5)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Warsaw 1.99 2.11 2.28 NA NA 1.21 1.05 1.27 NA NA 51% 49% 45% NA NA
Bydgoszcz NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 43% 42% 39% NA NA
Gdansk NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 58% 49% 51% NA NA
Krakow NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 53% 45% 45% NA NA
Katowice NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 49% 46% 39% NA NA
Lublin / Świdnik NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 37% 39% 37% NA NA
Lodz NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 42% 35% 34% NA NA
Modlin NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 66% 61% 55% NA NA
Poznan NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 41% 36% 36% NA NA
Rzeszow NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 53% 49% 27% NA NA
Szczecin NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 53% 58% 51% NA NA
Olsztyn-Mazury NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 48% 54% 39% NA NA
Wroclaw Airport NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 43% 40% 35% NA NA
Zielona Gora NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 68% 61% 63% NA NA
Radom NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Civil-Military dimension

Focus on Civil-Military dimension

Update on Military dimension of the plan

No data available.

Military - related measures implemented or planned to improve capacity

No data available.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#6

On strategic airspace management level, all significant exercises and permanent areas are evaluated and analysed taking into account historic civil traffic flows and civil traffic predictions. The impact, depending on the scale, is consulted with the key stakeholders including neighbouring states, aerodrome operators, aircraft operators, ATS, military, EUROCONTROL NM.

The lateral and vertical limits of the airspace elements published are designated considering the actual needs of users and nature of activities. All airspace elements shall be planned only for the time period necessary to perform the intended task. The user is obliged to specify precisely the period of activity of a selected element and all timely suspensions of activity between these periods.

The locations of the activities are designed not to affect the main traffic flows, ATC routes, DCTs and POLFRA connectivity. Segmentation, time and level restrictions are imposed when needed to mitigate the impact in location in heavy traffic periods of the day. If possible class C TRA airspace is implemented to minimize the impact on civil routing. When the areas excess the set scale they are always divided into smaller modules/segments. Each of these segments is designed in order to fit particular activities without necessity to activate the whole area to perform specific assignments. The shape of these segments is always aligned with main civil traffic flows to minimize the horizontal flight inefficiency. Further measures include:
- update of local ASM system/radar data added to visualize military activity in segregated areas. As a result, update of coordination procedures to reduce the time required to release segregated areas back to civil traffic.
- implementation of closer cooperation between AMC Poland and FMP Warszawa in order to reduce as much as possible negative influence of segregated areas on civil traffic. Implementation of new coordination procedures (NPZ management) taking into account forecasted demand of civil traffic on segregated airspace allocation in time on the day of the operations.

Annual review of the efficiency of airspace utilization is conducted.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#7

The available flight planning options are constantly updated to allow Aircraft Operator (AO) to plan the most horizontally effective trajectory, even when the areas are active. Except ATS network and DCTs, the AOs have the possibility to plan in the Free Route Airspace environment (POLFRA). Implementation of cross-border free route airspace operations within Lithuanian and Polish airspace (BALTIC FRA) and the cross border operations between BALTIC FRA and South East Europe FRA were implemented in 1Q 2022 which could further increase the planning opportunities.

The lateral and vertical limits of the airspace elements published are designated considering the actual needs of users and nature of activities. All airspace elements shall be planned only for the time period necessary to perform the intended task. The user is obliged to specify precisely the period of activity of a selected element and all timely suspensions of activity between these periods. Segmentation, time and level restrictions are imposed when needed to mitigate the impact in location in heavy traffic periods of the day. If possible class C TRA airspace is implemented to minimize the impact on civil routing.

Special procedures are prepared including dynamic change of level or segment and creation of new temporary routings for avoidance of military traffic. Further measures include:
- update of local ASM system/radar data added to visualize military activity in segregated areas. As a result, update of coordination procedures to reduce the time required to release segregated areas back to civil traffic.
- implementation of closer cooperation between AMC Poland and FMP Warszawa in order to reduce as much as possible negative influence of segregated areas on civil traffic. Implementation of new coordination procedures (NPZ management) taking into account forecasted demand of civil traffic on segregated airspace allocation in time on the day of the operations.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#8

The lateral and vertical limits of the airspace elements published are designated considering the actual needs of users and nature of activities. All airspace elements shall be planned only for the period necessary to perform the intended task. The user is obliged to specify precisely the period of activity of a selected element and all timely suspensions of activity between these periods. Segmentation, time and level restrictions are imposed when needed to mitigate the impact in location in heavy traffic periods of the day. If possible class C TRA airspace is implemented to minimize the impact on civil routing.

Special procedures are prepared including dynamic change of level or area segment. Further measures include:
- update of local ASM system/radar data added to visualize military activity in segregated areas. As a result, update of coordination procedures to reduce the time required to release segregated areas back to civil traffic.
- implementation of closer cooperation between AMC Poland and FMP Warszawa in order to reduce as much as possible negative influence of segregated areas on civil traffic. Implementation of new coordination procedures (NPZ management) taking into account forecasted demand of civil traffic on segregated airspace allocation in time on the day of the operations.

 
  • © European Union, 2025

  • Disclaimer

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission