• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • Investments
    • SES RP3

    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • About
  • Download
  • Data Portal
  • Publications
  1. Environment
  • Year report
    • RP3
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021 ✓
    • 2020

  • Poland
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Safety occurrences
      • Runway incursions
      • Separation minima infringements
      • Occurrences reporting
    • ASDRS

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ - Poland EPWA
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ - Poland Others
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Environment - Poland

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Poland achieved a KEA performance of 2.33% compared to its target of 1.65% and did not contribute positively towards achieving the Union-wide target. KEA worsened by 40% compared to 2020.

▪ Poland states this situation was caused largely by elements linked to the geopolitical situation leading to users from the Russian Federation avoiding the airspace of Ukraine, European users avoiding that of Belarus, and flights circumnavigating Kaliningrad.

▪ SCR was the highest in five years, which the NSA states may be due to restricted airspace beyond Poland’s control. KEP was also the highest in five years and increased by 20% compared to 2020.

▪ The share of CDO flights has slightly decreased compared to 2020, but is still higher than during pre-pandemic years.

▪ Additional time in terminal airspace has improved by 0.16 min/flight, while additional taxi out time has increased by 0.12min/flight.

En route performance

Horizontal flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) (KPI#1), of the last filed flight plan (KEP) (PI#1) & shortest constrained route (SCR) (PI#2)

Terminal performance

Additional taxi-out time (AXOT) (PI#3) & Arrival Sequencing and Metering Area (ASMA) time (PI#4)

Focus on ASMA & AXOT

AXOT

Additional taxi-out times at Warsaw (EPWA; 2019: 3.43 min/dep.; 2020: 1.99 min/dep.; 2021: 2.11 min/dep.) have slightly increased. The annual average is influenced by the performance during the winter months due to de-icing. The longest additional times were observed in January, February and December with more than 5 min/dep., while in Summer they were somewhat above 1 min/dep..

The Polish NSA reports that A-CDM was implemented in 2020 at Warsaw, which should also help reduce these additional taxi-out times. In addition, it is planned to implement a Traffic Complexity tool by 2022 and A-SMGCS by 2024.

ASMA

Additional times in the terminal airspace of Warsaw (EPWA; 2019: 2.09 min/arr.; 2020: 1.21 min/arr. 2021: 1.05 min/arr.) remained under 1 min/arr. in the first half of the year, but then increased in line with the traffic recovery.

The Polish NSA reports that Arrival Manager (AMAN) (2019) was implemented in 2019 and that a TMA reconfiguration & resectorization, including new SID/STAR procedures was implemented in 2021.

Share of arrivals applying continuous descent operations (CDOs) (PI#5)

Focus CDOs

All airports have shares of CDO flights (well) above the overall RP3 value in 2021 (30.5%) with values ranging from 34.5% to 61.2%. Lublin, Olsztyn-Mazury and Szczecin-Goleniów had higher values than in 2020 (EPLB: +2.3 percentage points; EPSY: +6.5 percentage points; EPSC: +5.4 percentage points) while the values for the other airports decreased (between -8.5 and -1.4 percentage points).

According to the Polish monitoring report: Measures implemented before 2021:
- Arrival Manager for EPWA (2019).
Implemented in 2021:
- New SID/STAR improved procedures for EPWA (2021);
- Electronic Flight Strip EFES implemented in: EPRZ, EPLB, EPSC, EPBY, EPLL, EPZG (2021).
Planned:
- Electronic Flight Strip EFES: EPMO (2022);
- EPKK, EPPO TMAs Reconfiguration & resectorisation (2022-23);
- New SID/STAR procedures for EPKK (2022);
- New SID/STAR procedures for EPRA (2023).

The situation will be continuously monitored by NSA based on the information provided by Polish Air Navigation Services Agency – PANSA.

Airport level
Airport
Additional taxi-out time (PI#3)
Additional ASMA time (PI#4)
Share of arrivals applying CDO (PI#5)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Warsaw 1.99 2.11 NA NA NA 1.21 1.05 NA NA NA 51% 49% NA NA NA
Bydgoszcz NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 43% 42% NA NA NA
Gdansk NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 58% 49% NA NA NA
Krakow NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 53% 45% NA NA NA
Katowice NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 49% 46% NA NA NA
Lublin / Świdnik NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 37% 39% NA NA NA
Lodz NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 42% 35% NA NA NA
Modlin NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 66% 61% NA NA NA
Poznan NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 41% 36% NA NA NA
Rzeszow NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 53% 49% NA NA NA
Szczecin NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 53% 58% NA NA NA
Olsztyn-Mazury NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 48% 54% NA NA NA
Wroclaw Airport NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 43% 40% NA NA NA
Zielona Gora NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 68% 61% NA NA NA
Radom NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Civil-Military dimension

Focus on Civil-Military dimension

Update on Military dimension of the plan

No new information provided as update.

Military - related measures implemented or planned to improve capacity

On strategic airspace management level all significant military exercises and permanent military areas are evaluated and analysed taking into account historic civil traffic flows and civil traffic predictions taking into account both entry count and occupancy.

The locations of the military activities are, whenever possible, designed not to affect the main traffic flows, ATC routes, DCTs and POLFRA connectivity and to have minimal or even no impact on capacity. Segmentation, time and level restrictions are imposed when needed to mitigate the impact in location in heavy traffic periods of day. If possible class C TRA airspace is implemented to minimize the impact on civil operations. Further measures include:
- update of local ASM system/radar data added to visualize military activity in segregated areas. As a result, update of coordination procedures to reduce time required to release segregated areas back to civil traffic.
- implementation of closer cooperation between AMC Poland and FMP Warszawa in order to reduce as much as possible negative influence of segregated areas on civil traffic. Implementation of new coordination procedures (NPZ management) taking into account forecasted demand of civil traffic on segregated airspace allocation in time on day of the operations.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#6

On strategic airspace management level all significant exercises and permanent areas are evaluated and analyzed taking into account historic civil traffic flows and civil traffic predictions. The impact, depending on scale, is consulted with the key stakeholders including neighboring states, aerodrome operators, aircraft operators, ATS, military, EUROCONTROL NM.

The lateral and vertical limits of the airspace elements published are designated considering the actual needs of users and nature of activities. All airspace elements shall be planned only for the time period necessary to perform the intended task. The user is obliged to specify precisely the period of activity of a selected element and all timely suspensions of activity between these periods.

The locations of the activities are designed not to affect the main traffic flows, ATC routes, DCTs and POLFRA connectivity. Segmentation, time and level restrictions are imposed when needed to mitigate the impact in location in heavy traffic periods of day. If possible class C TRA airspace is implemented to minimize the impact on civil routing. When the areas excess the set scale they are always divided into smaller modules/segments. Each of these segments is designed in order to fit particular activities without necessity to activate the whole area to perform specific assignments. The shape of these segments is always aligned with main civil traffic flows to minimize the horizontal flight inefficiency. Further measures planned to be implemented include:
- improvement/automation of exchange of information about military activity in segregated areas, especially on tactical level. Update of coordination procedures and local ASM support tool/system which will reduce time required to release segregated areas back to civil traffic.
- implementation of closer cooperation between AMC Poland and FMP Warszawa in order to reduce as much as possible negative influence of segregated areas on civil traffic. Implementation of new coordination procedures taking into account forecasted demand of civil traffic on segregated airspace allocation in time on day of the operations.

Annual review of the efficiency of airspace utilization is conducted.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#7

The available flight planning options are constantly updated to allow Aircraft Operator (AO) to plan the most horizontally effective trajectory, even when the areas are active. Except ATS network and DCTs, the AOs have the possibility to plan in Free Route Airspace environment (POLFRA). Implementation of cross-border free route airspace operations within Lithuanian and Polish airspace (BALTIC FRA) and the cross border operations between BALTIC FRA and South East Europe FRA were implemented in 1Q 2022 which could further increase the planning opportunities.

The lateral and vertical limits of the airspace elements published are designated considering the actual needs of users and nature of activities. All airspace elements shall be planned only for the time period necessary to perform the intended task. The user is obliged to specify precisely the period of activity of a selected element and all timely suspensions of activity between these periods.

Segmentation, time and level restrictions are imposed when needed to mitigate the impact in location in heavy traffic periods of day. If possible class C TRA airspace is implemented to minimize the impact on civil routing. Special procedures are prepared including dynamic change of level or segment and creation of new temporary routings for avoidance of military traffic.

Further measures include:
- update of local ASM system/radar data added to visualize military activity in segregated areas. As a result, update of coordination procedures to reduce time required to release segregated areas back to civil traffic.
- implementation of closer cooperation between AMC Poland and FMP Warszawa in order to reduce as much as possible negative influence of segregated areas on civil traffic. Implementation of new coordination procedures (NPZ management) taking into account forecasted demand of civil traffic on segregated airspace allocation in time on day of the operations.

The situation will be continuously monitored by NSA based on the information provided by Polish Air Navigation Services Agency – PANSA.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#8

As for PI#7.

 
  • © European Union, 2025

  • Disclaimer

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission