Environment - Latvia
PRB monitoring
▪ Latvia achieved a KEA performance of 6.26% compared to its target of 1.25% and did not contribute positively to the Union-wide target. KEA performance further worsened by 4.64 p.p. in comparison to 2021.
▪ The KEA deterioration was due to significant route extensions as a result of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.
▪ Both KEP and SCR followed the same trend and worsened in comparison with 2021’s performance.
▪ The share of CDO flights increased by 15.05% compared to 2021.
▪ During 2022, additional time in terminal airspace decreased from 0.52 to 0.33 min/flight, while additional taxi out time increased from 2.74 to 2.82 min/flight.
En route performance
Horizontal flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) (KPI#1), of the last filed flight plan (KEP) (PI#1) & shortest constrained route (SCR) (PI#2)
Terminal performance
Additional taxi-out time (AXOT) (PI#3) & Arrival Sequencing and Metering Area (ASMA) time (PI#4)
| Airport level | |||||||||||||||
| Airport |
Additional taxi-out time (PI#3)
|
Additional ASMA time (PI#4)
|
Share of arrivals applying CDO (PI#5)
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | |
| Riga | 1.85 | 3.57 | 2.82 | NA | NA | 0.73 | 0.52 | 0.33 | NA | NA | 56% | 53% | 61% | NA | NA |
| Liepaya | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 66% | 20% | 22% | NA | NA |
| Ventstpils | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 50% | 88% | 100% | NA | NA |