• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • Investments
    • SES RP3

    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • About
  • Download
  • Data Portal
  • Publications
  1. Environment
  • Year report
    • RP3
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022 ✓
    • 2021
    • 2020

  • Croatia
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Safety occurrences
      • Runway incursions
      • Separation minima infringements
      • Occurrences reporting
    • ASDRS

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Environment - Croatia

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Croatia achieved a KEA performance of 1.49% compared to its target of 1.46% and did not contribute positively towards achieving the Union-wide target. For the first time in five years, Croatia slightly missed the target in 2022.

▪ The NSA states that there were no specific reasons why the performance target was not achieved.

▪ Both KEP and SCR deteriorated in comparison to 2021.

▪ Croatia has no airports that are regulated under the RP3 performance and charging scheme.

En route performance

Horizontal flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) (KPI#1), of the last filed flight plan (KEP) (PI#1) & shortest constrained route (SCR) (PI#2)

Civil-Military dimension

Focus on Civil-Military dimension

Update on Military dimension of the plan

The analysis can not be provided due to reason that all required data for ENV PI #6, PI #7 and PI #8 are not yet available on the NM/PRU dashboards nor delivered by NM upon request.

During the preparation of the EUROCONTROL CAPAN study in 2022, it was recognized that military traffic has no significant impact on the sector capacities of the LDZO ACC.

Military - related measures implemented or planned to improve capacity

FUA restrictions and CDRs have been implemented which are managed by AMC on ASM Level 2 and notified to NM but were sparsely used or required due to significant decrease of military activities and air traffic affected by COVID-19 crisis.

No remedial measures identified.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#6

The Network Manager shall provide on a monthly basis the data required for the monitoring of this indicator for monitoring referred to Regulation (EU) 2019/317 point 6 of Annex VI.

The data regarding ratio of using available airspace structures has been received from NM upon request but the data regarding number of aircraft flying via reserved or segregated airspace and CDRs and number of aircraft that could have planned through those airspace structures have not been delivered by NM upon request nor such data are available on the NM/PRU dashboards.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#7

The Network Manager shall provide on a monthly basis the data required for the monitoring of this indicator for monitoring referred to Regulation (EU) 2019/317 point 6 of Annex VI.

The data regarding ratio of using available airspace structures has been received from NM upon request but the data regarding number of aircraft flying via reserved or segregated airspace and CDRs and number of aircraft that could have planned through those airspace structures have not been delivered by NM upon request nor such data are available on the NM/PRU dashboards.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#8

The Network Manager shall provide on a monthly basis the data required for the monitoring of this indicator for monitoring referred to Regulation (EU) 2019/317 point 6 of Annex VI.

The data regarding ratio of using available airspace structures has been received from NM upon request but the data regarding number of aircraft flying via reserved or segregated airspace and CDRs and number of aircraft that could have planned through those airspace structures have not been delivered by NM upon request nor such data are available on the NM/PRU dashboards.

 
  • © European Union, 2025

  • Disclaimer

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission