• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • About
  • Download
  • Publications
  1. Environment
  • Year report
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020 ✓

  • Italy
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Occurrences

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ - Italy Zone 1
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ - Italy Zone 2
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Environment - Italy

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Italy achieved a KEA performance of 2.85% compared to its reference value of 2.83% and therefore did not contribute positively towards achieving the Union-wide target.

▪ Italy did not provide further explanations of its performance within the monitoring report, which is disappointing as the PRB expects the NSA to provide complete monitoring reports.

▪ While the share of flights operating CCO/CDO at Italian airports improved in 2020 compared to 2019, the CDO performance was below the level achieved in 2016, which suggests there was not a specific focus to improve this metric.

▪ The additional time airspace users spent taxiing or holding in terminal airspace reduced by 53% compared to 2019.

En route performance

Horizontal flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) (KPI#1), of the last filed flight plan (KEP) (PI#1) & shortest constrained route (SCR) (PI#2)

Terminal performance

Additional taxi-out time (AXOT) (PI#3) & Arrival Sequencing and Metering Area (ASMA) time (PI#4)

Focus on ASMA & AXOT

AXOT

Additional taxi-out times at Rome Fiumicino observed the highest reduction (LIRF; 2019: 7.87 min/dep.; 2020: 3.1 min/dep.), however this is the worst performance observed in 2020 at the RP3 airports subject to monitoring of this indicator. The performance was worse in the first 5 months of the year, with the highest average times observed in April, despite being the lowest month in traffic. From June to December additional taxi-out times at Fiumicino averaged 1.62 min/dep.
Malpensa (LIMC; 2019: 4.76 min/dep.; 2020: 2.66 min/dep.) had notably improved additional taxi-out times as of March, and especially from June to November (when they averaged 1.62 min/dep.) but then in December these increased again back to 4.66 min/dep. (probably influenced by remote de-icing procedures)
At Bergamo (LIME) and Venice (LIPZ) the additional taxi-out times decreased by approximately 45%, while at Milan Linate (LIML) they have reduced by 20%.

ASMA

The additional ASMA times showed a drastic reduction associated to the decrease in traffic, averaging zero min/arr. at Rome Fiumicino, Milan Malpensa and Bergamo in April and May.
The highest annual reduction in additional times in the terminal airspace at Italian airport was observed at Milan Malpensa (LIMC; 2019: 2.59 min/arr.; 2020: 0.85 min/arr.) where these times were zero in April and May and averaged 0.55 min/arr. from May to December.

Share of arrivals applying continuous descent operations (CDOs) (PI#5)

Focus CDOs

Rome-Fiumicino (LIRF), being the major airport in Italy, has the highest share of CDO flights of the 5 airports: 42.9% which is above the overall RP3 value in 2020 (32.5%). Bergamo (LIME) and Venice (LIPZ) also have shares of CDO flights higher than the overall RP3 value (LIME: 39.0%; LIPZ: 33.8%).
Milan-Linate (LIML) and Milan-Malpensa respectively have 27.9% and 24.0% of CDO flights.

Airport level
Airport Name
Additional taxi-out time (PI#3)
Additional ASMA time (PI#4)
Share of arrivals applying CDO (PI#5)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Orio Al Serio 1.02 NA NA NA NA 0.45 NA NA NA NA 39% NA NA NA NA
Linate 1.93 NA NA NA NA 0.78 NA NA NA NA 28% NA NA NA NA
Malpensa 2.66 NA NA NA NA 0.85 NA NA NA NA 24% NA NA NA NA
Fiumicino 3.10 NA NA NA NA 1.25 NA NA NA NA 43% NA NA NA NA
Venice Tessera 1.38 NA NA NA NA 1.06 NA NA NA NA 34% NA NA NA NA

Civil-Military dimension

Focus on Civil-Military dimension

Update on Military dimension of the plan

No data available

Military - related measures implemented or planned to improve environment and capacity

No data available

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#6

No data available

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#7

No data available

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#8

No data available

 
  • © European Union, 2024

  • Disclaimer

  • [email protected]

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission