• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • Investments
    • SES RP3

    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • About
  • Download
  • Data Portal
  • Publications
  1. Environment
  • Year report
    • RP3
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020 ✓

  • Belgium
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Safety occurrences
      • Runway incursions
      • Separation minima infringements
      • Occurrences reporting
    • ASDRS

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Environment - Belgium

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ FABEC stated that half of the Union-wide RAD simplifications applied in 2020 were within FABEC airspace and that eNM measures were not needed. This helped improve the shortest constrained routes within FABEC, but was not sufficient in helping to reach the FAB-level KEA reference value (2.90%) in 2020. At a national level, Belgium and Luxembourg achieved a KEA performance of 3.37% and the FABEC reference value is 2.90%.

▪ FABEC mentioned that KEA is proportional to delays and stated that this impacted performance. The PRB does not agree with this as FABEC did not experience significant delays in 2020 and Belgium achieved its capacity breakdown value.

▪ While the share of flights operating CCO/CDO at Brussels airport improved in 2020 compared to 2019, the CDO performance is below the level achieved in 2016 when there was more congestion. The additional time airspace users spent taxiing or holding in terminal airspace reduced by 30% compared to 2019.

En route performance

Horizontal flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) (KPI#1), of the last filed flight plan (KEP) (PI#1) & shortest constrained route (SCR) (PI#2)

Terminal performance

Additional taxi-out time (AXOT) (PI#3) & Arrival Sequencing and Metering Area (ASMA) time (PI#4)

Focus on ASMA & AXOT

AXOT

Additional taxi-out times at Brussels decreased in 2020 (EBBR; 2019: 2.21 min/dep.; 2020: 1.36 min/dep.; ). This indicator was quite stable for Brussels for the last 5 years with monthly values around the 2 min/dep. This trend changed as of April 2020, when these additional taxi-out times were close to zero and the rest of the year have kept below one minute per departure.

ASMA

Additional ASMA times at Brussels decreased in 2020 (EBBR; 2019: 1 min/arr.; 2020: 0.89 min/arr.). For the last 5 years, Brussels kept the additional ASMA times around or below the minute per arrival, showing very good performance. In the beginning of 2020 these times increased reaching almost 2 min/arr in February. Between April and September, due to the drastic reduction in traffic, the additional ASMA times were practically zero.

Share of arrivals applying continuous descent operations (CDOs) (PI#5)

Focus CDOs

The share of CDO flights for Brussels is 18% which is quite low compared to other airports with similar traffic numbers and the overall RP3 value (32.5%).

According to the FABEC monitoring report: Some ANSPs are not able to manage the full flight from ToD due to the size/shape of their airspace, which in turn affects their performance for this indicator.

Airport level
Airport
Additional taxi-out time (PI#3)
Additional ASMA time (PI#4)
Share of arrivals applying CDO (PI#5)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Brussels 1.36 NA NA NA NA 0.89 NA NA NA NA 18% NA NA NA NA

Civil-Military dimension

Focus on Civil-Military dimension

Update on Military dimension of the plan

No data available.

Military - related measures implemented or planned to improve environment and capacity

No data available.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#6

No data available.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#7

No data available.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#8

No data available.

 
  • © European Union, 2025

  • Disclaimer

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission