• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • Investments
    • SES RP3

    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • About
  • Download
  • Data Portal
  • Publications
  1. Environment
  • Year report
    • RP3
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020 ✓

  • Austria
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Safety occurrences
      • Runway incursions
      • Separation minima infringements
      • Occurrences reporting
    • ASDRS

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Environment - Austria

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Austria achieved a KEA performance of 1.92% compared to its reference value of 1.90% and, therefore, did not contribute positively towards achieving the Union-wide target.

▪ The NSA explained that KEA is highly sensitive to traffic, which on some days increased to 80% of summer 2019 levels and caused KEA to exceed 2%. Moreover, adverse weather and airspace users’ choice for longer routes were said to affect the results.

▪ However, the PRB notes that Austria’s daily traffic variation data shows that it managed at 63% of its 2019 summer traffic levels. Thus, the reasoning is not consistent with the data.

▪ Only one out of six Austrian airports that are regulated reported terminal data.

▪ While the share of flights operating CCO/CDO at Austrian airports improved in 2020 compared to 2019, the CCO performance was at a similar level as 2017 despite less terminal congestion. The additional time airspace users spent taxiing or holding in terminal airspace reduced by 36% compared to 2019.

En route performance

Horizontal flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) (KPI#1), of the last filed flight plan (KEP) (PI#1) & shortest constrained route (SCR) (PI#2)

Terminal performance

Additional taxi-out time (AXOT) (PI#3) & Arrival Sequencing and Metering Area (ASMA) time (PI#4)

Focus on ASMA & AXOT

AXOT

Additional taxi-out times at Vienna significantly lowered (LOWW; 2019: 3.1 min/dep.; 2020: 2.07 min/dep.). This 2.07 min/dep. annual average was driven by very high additional times in January (probably related to de-icing procedures). In fact since April and until November, the additional times were around 1 min/dep.

According to the Austrian monitoring report: AMAN/DMAN coupling will be considered as one measure to optimize taxi-out times. Moreover, due to the closure of gates and blocked areas, taxi out times take partially longer than in pre-COVID times.

ASMA

In a similar way to the additional taxi-out times, the additional times in the terminal airspace around Vienna were very impacted by the reduction in traffic as of April, resulting in a 40% reduction in the annual average (LOWW; 2019: 2.13 min/arr.; 2020: 1.28 min/arr.). The additional ASMA times remained well under 0.5 min/arr. between April and July, and below one min/arr. between August and November.

According to the Austrian monitoring report: AMAN/DMAN coupling will be considered as one measure to optimize additional time in terminal airspace

Share of arrivals applying continuous descent operations (CDOs) (PI#5)

Focus CDOs

Vienna (LOWW), being the major airport in Austria, has the highest share of CDO flights in Austria: 34.4% which is slightly higher than the overall RP3 value in 2020 (32.5%). The other airports have 20-30% of CDO flights, except for Salzburg (LOWS): 15.9%.

Airport level
Airport
Additional taxi-out time (PI#3)
Additional ASMA time (PI#4)
Share of arrivals applying CDO (PI#5)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Vienna 2.07 NA NA NA NA 1.28 NA NA NA NA 34% NA NA NA NA
Graz NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 28% NA NA NA NA
Innsbruck NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 22% NA NA NA NA
Klagenfurt NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 33% NA NA NA NA
Linz NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 31% NA NA NA NA
Salzburg NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 16% NA NA NA NA

Civil-Military dimension

Focus on Civil-Military dimension

Update on Military dimension of the plan

The impact of military dimension on the environment KPA is very low, due to a very elaborate flexible handling of all flights crossing military areas. There is no impact, from the military dimension, on the capacity KPA so far. The planning of airspace use at pre-tactical level is done via the civil / military joint unit Airspace Management Cell (AMC).

Military - related measures implemented or planned to improve environment and capacity

No data available.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#6

Close cooperation between ACC and MIL Control Centre is part of continuous improvement to achieve a dynamic and flexible Use of Airspace.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#7

No data available.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#8

No data available.

 
  • © European Union, 2025

  • Disclaimer

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission