Environment - Estonia
PRB monitoring
▪ Estonia achieved a KEA performance of 1.21% compared to its reference value of 1.33% and therefore contributed positively towards achieving the Union-wide target.
▪ Estonia offers airspace users a cross-border free route airspace with its partners in NEFAB and DK-SE FAB and stated that overflying traffic is as direct as it can be. The data confirms this since the KEA performance is similar to the shortest constrained routes in 2020.
▪ Only one out of two Estonian airports that are regulated reported terminal data.
▪ The share of flights operating CCO/CDO at Estonian airports remained similar in 2020 compared to 2019. However, the performances are still class leading with more than 60% of all arrivals completing a CDO landing.
▪ Airspace users spent the same amount of additional time taxiing or holding in terminal airspace in 2020 as they did in 2019, i.e. the reduction in traffic did not help improve performance. Although the additional times are quite small at 1.29 minutes per flight, some improvement should have been possible given the lack of congestion.
En route performance
Horizontal flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) (KPI#1), of the last filed flight plan (KEP) (PI#1) & shortest constrained route (SCR) (PI#2)
Terminal performance
Additional taxi-out time (AXOT) (PI#3) & Arrival Sequencing and Metering Area (ASMA) time (PI#4)
| Airport level | |||||||||||||||
| Airport Name |
Additional taxi-out time (PI#3)
|
Additional ASMA time (PI#4)
|
Share of arrivals applying CDO (PI#5)
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | |
| Tallin | 0.85 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.44 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 61% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Tartu | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 70% | NA | NA | NA | NA |