Environment - Hungary
PRB monitoring
▪ Hungary achieved a KEA performance of 1.51% compared to its reference value of 1.45% and therefore did not contribute positively towards achieving the Union-wide target.
▪ Hungary did not explain why its performance fell short of 1.45%. Instead it was stated that removed RAD restrictions and improved cross-border free route airspace should have helped achieve the targets.
▪ Given that cross-border free route operation within SEE FRA is being expanded, Hungary has stated it plans to take no further remedial measures. The PRB believes that as the shortest constrained route in 2020 was higher than in 2018, Hungary must analyse why a less efficient airspace was made available in 2020 during low traffic and reconsider whether any remedial measures should be taken.
▪ The share of flights operating CCO/CDO at Budapest airport improved in 2020 compared to 2019. The additional time airspace users spent taxiing or holding in terminal airspace reduced by 38% compared to 2019.
En route performance
Horizontal flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) (KPI#1), of the last filed flight plan (KEP) (PI#1) & shortest constrained route (SCR) (PI#2)
Terminal performance
Additional taxi-out time (AXOT) (PI#3) & Arrival Sequencing and Metering Area (ASMA) time (PI#4)
| Airport level | |||||||||||||||
| Airport |
Additional taxi-out time (PI#3)
|
Additional ASMA time (PI#4)
|
Share of arrivals applying CDO (PI#5)
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | |
| Budapest | 0.87 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.66 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 33% | NA | NA | NA | NA |