• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • Investments
    • SES RP3

    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • About
  • Download
  • Data Portal
  • Publications
  1. Environment
  • Year report
    • RP3
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020 ✓

  • Spain
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Safety occurrences
      • Runway incursions
      • Separation minima infringements
      • Occurrences reporting
    • ASDRS

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ - Spain Continental
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • En route CZ - Spain Canarias
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Environment - Spain

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Spain achieved a KEA performance of 3.11% compared to its reference value of 3.23% and therefore contributed positively to the Union-wide target.

▪ The NSA stated that the 2020 KEA improvement is a direct consequence of the drastic reduction of traffic in 2020, which facilitated the implementation of operational and structural measures that have led to the improvement in horizontal efficiency. Spain offered airspace users direct routes, which meant that KEA performance was better than the shortest constrained routes.

▪ The share of flights operating CCO/CDO at Spanish airports improved in 2020 compared to 2019. The additional time airspace users spent taxiing or holding in terminal airspace reduced by 52% compared to 2019.

En route performance

Horizontal flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) (KPI#1), of the last filed flight plan (KEP) (PI#1) & shortest constrained route (SCR) (PI#2)

Terminal performance

Additional taxi-out time (AXOT) (PI#3) & Arrival Sequencing and Metering Area (ASMA) time (PI#4)

Focus on ASMA & AXOT

AXOT

The additional taxi out time at national level has decreased in 2020 by 53% in relation to the value of 2019 (not taking Alicante into account as this airport was not monitored in 2019). The drastic drop in traffic had a clear impact in the additional taxi-out times, and most of these airports averaged zero or practically zero minutes of additional time during April, May and June. With the partial recovery of the traffic in the Summer period, these times increased slightly and from July to December they averaged all together 0.85 min/dep. The most important reduction in the annual values with respect to 2019 was observed at Palma (LEPA; 2019: 2.16 min/dep.; 2020: 0.69 min/dep.).

According to the Spanish monitoring report: ENAIRE has implemented the D-DCL at the Airports of Palma, Barcelona, Malaga and Madrid, which automatizes departure authorizations, avoiding the saturation of the frequency that occurs in large airports and increasing efficiency. There is work in progress regarding the improvement of A-CDM in Madrid and Barcelona.

ASMA

The additional time in terminal area at national level has decreased by 52% in relation to the value of 2019 (not taking Alicante into account as this airport was not monitored in 2019). The evolution of this indicator is very similar to the additional taxi-out times, and in April-June most of these airports had zero or practically zero additional ASMA times. Although with the Summer these times increased again, the only averaged all together 0.42 min/arr in the second half of the year. Once more the most important reduction in the annual values with respect to 2019 was observed at Palma (LEPA; 2019: 1.31 min/arr.; 2020: 0.35 min/arr.), with -73% additional ASMA times.

According to the Spanish monitoring report: In recent years, restructuring projects have been implemented in some TMAs that have made it possible to streamline and optimise the flow of air traffic, reducing additional time in the ASMA: Barcelona 2018, Madrid (South configuration) 2019. More restructuring projects are planned for the coming years in the main TMAs in Spain:
- PBN SIDs, STARs and ILS & RNP APCH in Madrid TMA
- PBN SIDs in Barcelona TMA
- PBN SIDs, ILS & RNP APCH in Palma TMA
- PBN STARs in Malaga.

Share of arrivals applying continuous descent operations (CDOs) (PI#5)

Focus CDOs

Only Madrid (LEMD: 31.5%) has its share of CDO flights below the overall RP3 value in 2020 (32.5%). All other airports have shares of CDO flights above the overall RP3 value in 2020, ranging from 38.8% to 54.1%.

According to the Spanish monitoring report: Currently, Alicante, Madrid, Gran Canaria, Málaga and Palma airports have implemented continuous descent procedures (CDA) for night-time approaches. The conditions of use of continuous descent procedures mean that the use of this type of procedure is not always compatible with the techniques used when it is necessary to manage medium/high traffic demands at airports/TMAs. Therefore, the authorisation of these procedures must be compatible with the airport’s operations in order to meet the demand without establishing restrictions. In the long term, there are plans to modify the structure of the CDA procedures currently published at these airports and to transfer to the arrival procedures section of the AIP the information to proceed with the continuous descent from some point of the STARs to the IAF, to some point of the intermediate approach or to the IF, thus maximising the use of these operations. This is already in implemented at Ibiza and Barcelona Airport.

Airport level
Airport
Additional taxi-out time (PI#3)
Additional ASMA time (PI#4)
Share of arrivals applying CDO (PI#5)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Alicante 0.70 NA NA NA NA 0.41 NA NA NA NA 45% NA NA NA NA
Barcelona 1.84 NA NA NA NA 1.13 NA NA NA NA 39% NA NA NA NA
Las Palmas 1.09 NA NA NA NA 0.84 NA NA NA NA 47% NA NA NA NA
Ibiza 1.18 NA NA NA NA 0.61 NA NA NA NA 41% NA NA NA NA
Madrid/Barajas 2.12 NA NA NA NA 0.62 NA NA NA NA 32% NA NA NA NA
Malaga 1.39 NA NA NA NA 0.81 NA NA NA NA 54% NA NA NA NA
Palma De Mallorca 0.69 NA NA NA NA 0.35 NA NA NA NA 47% NA NA NA NA

Civil-Military dimension

Focus on Civil-Military dimension

Update on Military dimension of the plan

Environment: Civil-Military coordination regarding Flexible Use of Airspace is on progress at strategic level established within the specific working group called UPEA inside CIDETMA (previous CIDEFO). Dissemination of progress on FUA to civil operators is considered an enabler to achieve Flight Plans using more efficient routes through the Civil Use of Release Airspace (CURA).

AMC manual revision was finished and the new version is in force.

Capacity: Based on the Principles of FUA, additional capacity to the planned one could be provided once the airspace used for military operations and training is released.

Military - related measures implemented or planned to improve environment and capacity

Environment: Spanish Air Force has been active participant in the general meetings to implement the Spanish Free Route Airspace Programme and an specific group composed by ENAIRE and Spanish Air Force was created in order to further improve the coordination for the implementation of FRA, with a special focus in ASM related matters. Furthermore, a close coordination work with the Network Manager is ongoing.

Several meetings have been held and discussions are ongoing in order to implement new single CDR category and to revise airspace structures (Reserved areas and to re-align ATS routes). At national level, there are some improvements at strategic level, including the definition of a SSC transition plan. SSC (Single Category CDR) transition plan has the objective of using only one type of Conditional Route improving ASM procedures and optimizing the use of the airspace.

Capacity: Establishment of SCC and the FUA Pilot Project. SCC transition plan is explained above. Regarding the “FUA Pilot Project” is a project with civil-military coordination to improve the use of the airspace and associated procedures, from both points of view, civil and military, starting from some specific Danger areas and working in Collaborative Decision Making processes.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#6

Several meetings have been held and discussions are ongoing in order to implement the Single CDR Category, to revise restricted areas and to re-align ATS routes, including the definition of a SSC transition plan.

At national level, there are some improvements at strategic level, including the monitoring of the new mechanisms and the Pilot Project for FUA.

The particularities of this indicator are being analyzed in our airspace since there are no monthly data published at SES portal and, at the moment, they are annually provided by the Spanish Air Force NSA. This PI is being analyzed to develop a monitoring (where it is possible) not only annually but, at least, twice a year to evaluate the evolution of the indicators. If significant deviations are found, the possible causes will be analysed by contacting the relevant stakeholder.

It is not possible to identify this information independently per each ACC in the Peninsula because there are some areas that are in the airspace of more that one ACC. Statistics are available per Area. The data for the Peninsula is the data for Spain (above) minus the data for Canarias ACC. Data for effective use of reserved airspace in ACC is accurate as all the areas in this airspace are within the boundaries of the ACC.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#7

Spain is working on the transition to single CDR category. The particularities of this indicator in our airspace are being analyzed since there are no monthly data published at SES portal and, at the moment, they are only provided annually, at national level, by the ANSP. This PI is being analyzed to develop a monitoring (where it is possible) not only annually but, at least, twice a year to evaluate the evolution of the indicators. If significant deviations are found, the possible causes will be analysed by contacting the relevant stakeholder. No data is available per ACC.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#8

Spain is working on the transition to single CDR category. The particularities of this indicator in our airspace are being analyzed since there are no monthly data published at SES portal and, at the moment, they are only provided annually, at national level, by the ANSP. This PI is being analyzed to develop a monitoring (where it is possible) not only annually but, at least, twice a year to evaluate the evolution of the indicators. If significant deviations are found, the possible causes will be analysed by contacting the relevant stakeholder. No data available per ACC.

 
  • © European Union, 2025

  • Disclaimer

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission