AUC vs. DUC
In the combined year 2020-2021, the AUC was -0.9% (or -3.57 €2017) lower than the planned DUC. This results from the combination of lower than planned TNSUs (-1.1%) and lower than planned terminal costs in real terms (-2.0%, or -1.5 M€2017).
Terminal service units
The difference between actual and planned TNSUs (-1.1%) falls within the ±2% dead band. Hence the resulting loss of revenue is borne by the ANSP.
Terminal costs by entity
Actual real terminal costs are -2.0% (-1.5 M€2017) lower than planned. This is mainly driven by the lower costs of the main ANSP - Austro Control (-1.9%, or -1.3 M€2017 for ATM/CNS/AIS costs) and (-2.3%, or -0.1 M€2017 for MET costs). NSA costs were
-13.7% lower than planned.
Terminal costs for the main ANSP at charging zone level
The lower than planned terminal costs in real terms for Austro Control (-1.9%, or -1.3 M€2017, excluding the costs for meteorological services) result from:
- slightly lower staff costs (-0.2%);
- lower other operating costs (-3.9%); “due to cost containment measures of Austria such as reduction of travel expenses, non-operational training and much more”; and,
- lower depreciation (-4.1%) and cost of capital (-13.4%) reflecting delayed investments due to the impact of COVID-19; and,
- slightly lower exceptional costs (-0.2%).