• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • Investments
    • SES RP3

    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • About
  • Download
  • Data Portal
  • Publications
  1. Environment
  • Year report
    • RP3
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021 ✓
    • 2020

  • Austria
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Safety occurrences
      • Runway incursions
      • Separation minima infringements
      • Occurrences reporting
    • ASDRS

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Environment - Austria

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Austria achieved a KEA performance of 1.87% compared to its target of 1.96% and contributed positively to the Union-wide target. KEA performance improved by 0.3 p.p. in comparison to 2020.

▪ Lower traffic figures and the implementation of free route airspace contributed positively to achieving the target.

▪ Both KEP and SCR improved in comparison with 2020’s performance and reached the lowest values since 2017.

▪ Only one out of six Austrian airports that are regulated reported terminal environment data.

▪ The share of flights operating CDO at Austrian airports decreased in 2021 compared to 2020. Austria notes that their focus is CDO, with the performance being the best since 2017.

▪ The additional time airspace users spent taxiing out decreased by 6% compared to 2020. Additional time in terminal airspace de-creased by 26% compared to 2020.

En route performance

Horizontal flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) (KPI#1), of the last filed flight plan (KEP) (PI#1) & shortest constrained route (SCR) (PI#2)

Terminal performance

Additional taxi-out time (AXOT) (PI#3) & Arrival Sequencing and Metering Area (ASMA) time (PI#4)

Focus on ASMA & AXOT

AXOT

Additional taxi-out times at Vienna lowered again in 2021(LOWW; 2019: 3.1 min/dep.; 2020: 2.07 min/dep.; 2021: 1.94 min/dep.).

According to the Austrian monitoring report: AMAN/DMAN coupling will be considered as one measure to optimize taxi-out times.

ASMA

In a similar way to the additional taxi-out times, the additional times in the terminal airspace around Vienna were very impacted by the reduction in traffic in 2020 and further decreased in 2021 (LOWW; 2019: 2.13 min/arr.; 2020: 1.28 min/arr.; 2021: 0.95 min/arr.). The additional ASMA times remained under 1 min/arr. for the most part of 2021 and increased to values above 1 min/arr. in the last 4 months.

According to the Austrian monitoring report: AMAN/DMAN coupling will be considered as one measure to optimize additional time in terminal airspace.

Share of arrivals applying continuous descent operations (CDOs) (PI#5)

Focus CDOs

Vienna (LOWW), being the major airport in Austria, has the highest share of CDO flights in Austria: 32.2% which is slightly higher than the overall RP3 value in 2020 (30.5%). The other airports have 24-30% of CDO flights, except for Salzburg (LOWS): 15.4%. All airports have seen a (slight) reduction of the share of CDO flights, except for Innsbruck - LOWI which had an increase of 2.2 percentage points.

According to the Austrian monitoring report: CDO is a predominant activity for ACG to reach environmental targets. Cooperation procedures between ATS units (APP/ACC) have been improved to increase optimum descents, dependent on the actual traffic situation.

Airport level
Airport
Additional taxi-out time (PI#3)
Additional ASMA time (PI#4)
Share of arrivals applying CDO (PI#5)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Vienna 2.07 1.94 NA NA NA 1.28 0.95 NA NA NA 34% 32% NA NA NA
Graz NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 28% 24% NA NA NA
Innsbruck NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 22% 24% NA NA NA
Klagenfurt NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 33% 27% NA NA NA
Linz NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 31% 30% NA NA NA
Salzburg NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 16% 15% NA NA NA

Civil-Military dimension

Focus on Civil-Military dimension

Update on Military dimension of the plan

Military dimension has little to no impact on the enviromental KPA, due to a highly efficient and flexible use of airspace with close military coordination.

Practically no impact of MIL dimension on the capacity KPA. The planning of airspace use at pre-tactical level is done via the civil/military joint unit Airspace Management Cell (AMC). Day-to-day co-ordination of Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) is handled at the tactical level between civil ATS Units and representatives of the Military Control Centre (MCC). FUA Level 3 is fully applied.

Military - related measures implemented or planned to improve capacity

No data available.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#6

No data available.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#7

CDR not applied in Austria. The majority of aircraft flying and filing through reserved and segregated areas is enabled to do so, thanks to a very flexible CIV/MIL coordination for the active areas concerned.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#8

CDR not applied in Austria. The majority of aircraft filing and flying through reserved or segregated areas is enabled to do so, thanks to a very flexible CIV/MIL coordination for the active areas concerned.

 
  • © European Union, 2025

  • Disclaimer

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission