• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • About
  • Download
  • Publications
  1. Capacity
  • Year report
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021 ✓
    • 2020

  • Poland
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Occurrences

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ - Poland EPWA
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ - Poland Others
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Capacity - Poland

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Poland registered 0.07 minutes of average en route ATFM delay per flight during 2021, thus meeting the local breakdown value of 0.07. The main delay causes were ATC staffing and ATC capacity, and the delays were mostly generated in December 2021 due to staffing issues at Warsaw ACC.

▪ Delays should be considered in the context of lower traffic: in Poland, IFR movements in 2021 were 48% lower than in 2019.

▪ Poland has received additional traffic due to airspace closures East of the SES airspace. Despite this, 2019 traffic levels are not likely to be reached during RP3. An increase in the number of ATCOs in OPS is planned in Warsaw ACC by the end of RP3.

▪ Delays were highest in December, mostly driven by ATC Staffing issues.

▪ The share of delayed flights with delays longer than 15 minutes in Poland increased by 23.05 p.p. compared to 2020 and was higher than 2019 values.

▪ The yearly total of sector opening hours in Warsaw ACC was 29,815, showing a 36.8% increase compared to 2020. Sector opening hours are 30.4% below 2019 levels.

▪ Warsaw ACC registered 14.11 IFR movements per one sector opening hour in 2021, being 26.5% below 2019 levels.

En route performance

En route ATFM delay (KPI#1)

Focus on en route ATFM delay

Summary of capacity performance

Poland experienced an increase in traffic from 377k flights in 2020 to 473k flights in 2021. However, traffic levels were still substantially below the 912k flights in 2019.

In 2021, Poland had 32k minutes of ATFM delay - with more than 90% attributed to ATC staffing. The vast majority of ATFM delays (29k) occurred in December 2021.

NSA’s assessment of capacity performance

Actual annual performance recorded in 2021 was in line with the target set for Poland in the revised RP3 performance plan. The target set for 2021 already took into account lower traffic levels following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The delays recorded in 2021 were determined mostly by two factors: ATC Staffing and ATC Capacity. 2% of the delays were attributable to weather conditions. Majority of the delays was generated in December 2021 and was related to staffing issues at ACC Warszawa.
The traffic reduction related to COVID-19 pandemic and actions undertaken by PANSA to mitigate risks related to possible infection spread among employees as well as flexible roster planning responding to expected traffic evolution under the rolling NOP planning allowed for achieving very low value of delays in the period January-November 2021 an in consequence to achieve the goal set for the year.

Monitoring process for capacity performance

The monitoring process in 2021 was conducted in accordance with Regulations (EU) 2019/317 and 2017/373 based on the information received from ANSPs. The data included ANSP’s business and annual plans and their consistency with the PP.
Despite the fact that the monitoring process was affected by COVID-19 pandemic, the monitoring activities of KPA CAPACITY were conducted systematically and covered, among the others, the following areas:
- implementation of major projects aimed at increasing capacity and enhancing flight efficiency,
- execution of employment plan, especially operational personnel,
- execution of training plan,
- ATCO productivity.
The scope of the selected areas was chosen taking into account airspace users’ remarks, as well as CAA own assessment. All the above supervision exercise was providing the CAA the awareness and knowledge on the ANSPs Performance.
The monitoring was performed also by dedicated Polish NSA inspectors during routine inspections.

Capacity planning

Due to COVID-19 pandemic and related traffic drop, 2021 was (similarly as 2020) quite exceptional - also in terms of capacity planning. Capacity planning focused on mid and long-term planning based on STATFOR forecasts, NM data, PANSA simulations and internal recovery plan prepared by PANSA as well as short term planning (up to 4-6 weeks) under the NOP rolling planning initiative coordinated by the Network Manager. Rostering at PANSA also had to consider implementation of measures aimed at limiting the risk of virus spread among ATCOs.
Despite the traffic drop and along with the above mentioned flexible rolling short-term capacity planning, PANSA continued to implement initiatives aimed at improving capacity in FIR Warszawa to meet challenges related to traffic increase after the crisis as well as potential changes in traffic flows. These included the following:
- continuation of new ATCOs training (continued training process for trainees employed before the pandemic breakout, while plans for additional recruitments to start 2020+ were suspended/revised, considering lower traffic levels expected by end of RP3 as well as difficulties related to training caused by low levels of traffic and COVID restrictions; new recruitment process for ATCO trainees started in January 2022),
- continued adaptation of the air traffic management system (Pegasus_21) to operational needs and modernisation of the ATM system,
- development of tools supporting ATCOs and flow management optimisation (including Traffic Complexity Tool and update of CAT system – implementation of CAT 3.0),
- continued investments in infrastructure (CNS) and technology allowing for optimisation of airspace structures and optimisation of coverage in the Polish airspace as well as supporting contingency,
- continued improvement of AMAN in Warsaw TMA,
- reorganisation of Warsaw TMA and Poznań TMA.
Plans for the following years of RP3 include, among others:
- reorganisation of ACC Warszawa sector configuration - three layer vertical division - to be implemented under staged approach (planned implementation postponed – new date to be decided),
- reorganisation of TMA Kraków in 2022 – new sectors, new SID/STAR procedures,
- continuation of training process for new ATCOs (new recruitment started 2022),
- refreshment training for current ATCOs to maintain their competence following the 2020-2021 significant traffic drop,
- adaptation of the air traffic management system to operational needs and modernisation of the ATM System,
- continued investments in infrastructure (CNS) and technology allowing for optimisation of airspace structures and optimisation of coverage in the Polish airspace as well as supporting resilience, scalability and flexibility of service provision,
- continuation of flexible rostering,
- evolving ACC sector configurations and management to cope with updated traffic forecasts,
- continued FMP dynamic management and ATFCM techniques including STAM,
- improvement of comprehensive airspace management.

Application of Corrective Measures for Capacity (if applicable)

There are two streams of risks which are expected to impact delays level in 2022:
- Risks linked to War in Ukraine – possible increase in delays due to military activities, also liked to increased number of NATO flights in eastern part of the Polish airspace. Significant portion of this part of airspace is reserved for military flights (performed H24) thus unavailable for civil traffic.
- Risks linked to staffing issues in ACC and APP Warszawa.
Depending on further evolution of the military conflict and situation related to ATCOs in PANSA, the impact may be also visible in 2023-2024 results.

On the risk related to impact of war in Ukraine, PANSA implemented RAD measures and EU Restrictions that were aimed to reduce ATFCM delays within EPWW FIR sectors with limited capacity due to additional military activity.

On the risk related to ATCOs, PANSA Management is running intensive negotiation process with the ATCO Trade Union.

Other indicators

Focus on ATCOs in operations

The deviation from planned figure at the end of 2021 results from unplanned demise of one ACC ATCO and reduction of working time of another ACC ATCO.

Terminal performance

Arrival ATFM delay (KPI#2)

Focus on arrival ATFM delay

For Poland the scope of the RP3 monitoring comprises a total of 15 airports. However, in accordance with IR (EU) 2019/317 and the traffic figures, only the main airport Warsaw (EPWA) must be monitored for the pre-departure delay indicators.
The Airport Operator Data Flow, necessary for the monitoring of the pre-departure delays, is correctly established where required and the monitoring of these indicators can be performed.
Traffic at the ensemble of these 15 airports in 2021, regardless of an increase of 22% with respect to 2020, was still 46 % lower than in 2019.
EPRA has been closed for civil traffic due to airport extension project.

Average arrival ATFM delays in 2021 was 0.00 min/arr, compared to 0.02 min/arr in 2020.
ATFM slot adherence has improved (2021: 96.2%; 2020: 95.3%).

The Polish monitoring report mentions these measures planned to be implemented at Warsaw (EPWA) in 2022+:
- Traffic Complexity Tool (2022),
- A-SMGCS (2024).

In average, arrival ATFM delays at Polish airports under monitoring have virtually disappeared in 2021.
The actual performance over 2021 was better than the target set in the revised RP3 performance plan.
From these marginal delays, ATC-related delays accounted for 60%, weather conditions generated 27% and aerodrome-related delays 13%.

At airport level, all airports accrued zero or nearly zero delays, with only Poznań-Ławica (EPPO) showing some marginal ATC capacity delays in July and September.

The provisional national target on arrival ATFM delay in 2021 was met.

In accordance with Article 3 (3) (a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627: The incentive scheme shall cover only the calendar years 2022 to 2024.

Other terminal performance indicators (PI#1-3)

Airport level
Airport name
Avg arrival ATFM delay (KPI#2)
Slot adherence (PI#1)
ATC pre departure delay (PI#2)
All causes pre departure delay (PI#3)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2020 2021 2022 2023 2020 2021 2022 2023 2020 2021 2022 2023
Bydgoszcz NA NA NA NA 94.0% 100.0% NA% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Gdansk NA NA NA NA 93.3% 97.0% NA% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Katowice NA NA NA NA 89.6% 92.3% NA% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Krakow 0.04 NA NA NA 95.9% 97.9% NA% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Lodz NA NA NA NA 100.0% 92.0% NA% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Lublin / Świdnik NA NA NA NA 91.7% 96.2% NA% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Modlin 0.01 NA NA NA 96.4% 98.3% NA% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Olsztyn-Mazury NA NA NA NA 88.9% 100.0% NA% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Poznan NA 0.01 NA NA 97.9% 97.3% NA% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Radom NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Rzeszow NA NA NA NA 93.3% 98.4% NA% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Szczecin NA NA NA NA 95.7% 100.0% NA% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Warsaw 0.04 0.00 NA NA 97.5% 97.4% NA% NA% 0.32 0.54 NA NA 9.3 12.6 NA NA
Wroclaw Airport NA 0.00 NA NA 88.9% 92.1% NA% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Zielona Gora NA NA NA NA 100.0% 100.0% NA% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Focus on performance indicators at airport level

ATFM slot adherence

With the drastic drop in traffic, the share of regulated departures from Polish airports virtually disappeared until July 2021.
Polish airports showed adherence between 88.9% and 100% and Warsaw (EPWA) reached 97.4%. The national average was 96.2%, slightly better than the previous year (95.3%). With regard to the 3.8% of flights that did not adhere, 2% was early and 1.8% was late.
According to the Polish monitoring report: Performance achieved in 2021 should not be compared to previous years (before 2020). Due to COVID-19 pandemic and related traffic drop, data for 2021 is not reliable and not comparable to periods before the pandemic.

ATC pre-departure delay

The calculation of the ATC pre-departure delay is based on the data provided by the airport operators through the Airport Operator Data Flow (APDF) which is properly implemented at Warsaw. The quality of the airport data reported by EPWA has improved after the COVID crisis and it is possible again to calculate this indicator.
The annual value has decreased with respect to 2019 (EPWA: 2019: 0.87 min/dep; 2021: 0.59 min/dep) driven by the lower values in the first half of 2021. At monthly level and with the traffic recovery, the figures have increased and gotten closer to the 2019 values.

All causes pre-departure delay

Warsaw is the only Polish airport subject to the monitoring of this indicator.
The total (all causes) delay in the actual off block time at Warsaw increased in 2021 (EPWA: 2020: 9.32 min/dep.; 2021: 12.61 min/dep.). The highest delays per flight were observed in December, averaging almost 18 min/dep.
According to the Polish monitoring report: Due to COVID-19 pandemic and related traffic reduction, data for 2021 is not reliable and not comparable to periods before 2020 (pre-pandemic).

 
  • © European Union, 2024

  • Disclaimer

  • [email protected]

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission