AUC vs. DUC
In combined year 2020-2021, the terminal AUC for TCZ2 was lower by -16.1% (-281.85 PLN2017 or -66.24 €2017) comparing to the DUC. This was in particular the effect of the lower than planned terminal costs in real terms (-14.7%, -35.5 MPLN2017 or -8.3 M€2017) for TCZ2.
Terminal service units
The difference between actual and planned TNSU for the zone (+1.8%) is within the ±2% dead-band, which results in additional revenues kept by the ANSPs.
Terminal costs by entity
Actual terminal costs are -14.7% lower than planned (-8.3 M€2017) which is mainly driven by the lower costs for PANSA (-18.2% or -8.2 M€2017). Slightly lower actual costs were observed for the METSPs in the zone (-1.0% or -0.09 M€2017), other ATSPs in the zone (-3.4% or -0.03 M€2017) and the NSA (-0.1%).
Terminal costs for the main ANSP at charging zone level
The lower than planned TCZ2 costs in real terms for PANSA (-18.2%, or -8.2M €2017) result from:
- lower en route staff costs for TCZ2 (by -20.4% or -6.3 M€2017), “resulting from a number of factors, including evolution of provisions also those for one-off elements of staff benefits reflected in the RP3 determined cost”, lower remuneration costs (due to lower employment level) and lower actual level of bonuses and rewards;
- lower terminal other operating costs for the zone (by -32.3% or -2.1 M€2017), resulting from costs cutting measures in 2021;
- higher, by +2.9% (or +0.2 M€2017) depreciation costs due to the difference in the useful life of some assets;
- slightly higher, by +0.4% costs of capital due to slightly lower value of asset base.