Environment - Malta
PRB monitoring
▪ Malta achieved a KEA performance of 3.11% compared to its target of 1.82% and did not contribute positively towards achieving the Union-wide target. Performance worsened by 23% compared to 2020.
▪ The NSA states that the KEA deterioration is caused by changes in traffic flow and intensity and by new data reported to the Network Manager by Turkey (affecting origin and destination considered for the calculation).
▪ However, the case of Turkish data reported to the Network Manager occurred in 2019. The effect was not restricted to Malta.
▪ Both KEP and SCR have been degrading since 2017 and are now the worst in five years.
▪ The share of CDO flights has remained similar over the last five years.
▪ Additional taxi out time and additional time in terminal airspace increased in comparison to 2020, but are still lower than pre-pandemic years.
En route performance
Horizontal flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) (KPI#1), of the last filed flight plan (KEP) (PI#1) & shortest constrained route (SCR) (PI#2)
Terminal performance
Additional taxi-out time (AXOT) (PI#3) & Arrival Sequencing and Metering Area (ASMA) time (PI#4)
| Airport level | |||||||||||||||
| Airport Name |
Additional taxi-out time (PI#3)
|
Additional ASMA time (PI#4)
|
Share of arrivals applying CDO (PI#5)
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | |
| Malta/Luqa | 0.89 | 1.10 | NA | NA | NA | 0.69 | 0.62 | NA | NA | NA | 51% | 52% | NA | NA | NA |