• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • Investments
    • SES RP3

    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • About
  • Download
  • Data Portal
  • Publications
  1. Environment
  • Year report
    • RP3
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021 ✓
    • 2020

  • Estonia
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Safety occurrences
      • Runway incursions
      • Separation minima infringements
      • Occurrences reporting
    • ASDRS

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Environment - Estonia

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Estonia’s KEA performance of 1.43% is almost identical to 2019. The target was 1.22%, which means Estonia did not contribute positively towards achieving the Union-wide target.

▪ The NSA states that Estonia has cross-border free route airspace with NEFAB + DK-SE FAB and the overflying traffic is as direct as possible.

▪ SCR is at the worst levels since 2017 and the KEP parameter is the second worst since 2017.

▪ The share of CDO flights has worsened since 2020 and is the lowest since 2017.

▪ Additional time in terminal airspace remained the same as for 2020, however, additional taxi out time increased by 21%.

En route performance

Horizontal flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) (KPI#1), of the last filed flight plan (KEP) (PI#1) & shortest constrained route (SCR) (PI#2)

Terminal performance

Additional taxi-out time (AXOT) (PI#3) & Arrival Sequencing and Metering Area (ASMA) time (PI#4)

Focus on ASMA & AXOT

AXOT

This indicator is not monitored for airports below 80 000 IFR movements average during the 2016-2018 period, so it is not monitored for any airport in this state.

ASMA

This indicator is not monitored for airports below 80 000 IFR movements average during the 2016-2018 period, so it is not monitored for any airport in this state.

Share of arrivals applying continuous descent operations (CDOs) (PI#5)

Focus CDOs

The shares of CDO flights have significantly decreased (EETN: -4.8 percentage points; EETU: -25.2 percentage points) but are still well above the overall RP3 value in 2021 (30.5%) and in the higher range of all observed values in 2021.

Airport level
Airport
Additional taxi-out time (PI#3)
Additional ASMA time (PI#4)
Share of arrivals applying CDO (PI#5)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Tallin 0.85 1.03 NA NA NA 0.44 0.44 NA NA NA 61% 56% NA NA NA
Tartu NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 70% 44% NA NA NA

Civil-Military dimension

Focus on Civil-Military dimension

Update on Military dimension of the plan

No update provided.

Military - related measures implemented or planned to improve capacity

No impact of MIL dimension on the capacity KPA. The planning of airspace use at pre-tactical level is done via the civil/military joint unit Airspace Management Cell (AMC).

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#6

No data available.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#7

No data available.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#8

No data available.

 
  • © European Union, 2025

  • Disclaimer

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission