• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • Investments
    • SES RP3

    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • About
  • Download
  • Data Portal
  • Publications
  1. Environment
  • Year report
    • RP3
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021 ✓
    • 2020

  • Norway
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Safety occurrences
      • Runway incursions
      • Separation minima infringements
      • Occurrences reporting
    • ASDRS

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Environment - Norway

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Norway achieved a KEA performance of 1.34% compared to its target of 1.55% and contributed positively towards achieving the Union-wide target. KEA improved by 12% compared to 2020.

▪ Norway further improved KEP and SCR values, which are now similar to each other meaning airlines plan efficient routes.

▪ The share of CDO flights improved by two p.p. from 2020 and is currently at 70%.

▪ Additional time in terminal airspace was reduced by 17% in comparison to 2020, while additional taxi out time increased by 7%.

En route performance

Horizontal flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) (KPI#1), of the last filed flight plan (KEP) (PI#1) & shortest constrained route (SCR) (PI#2)

Terminal performance

Additional taxi-out time (AXOT) (PI#3) & Arrival Sequencing and Metering Area (ASMA) time (PI#4)

Focus on ASMA & AXOT

AXOT

The additional taxi-out times at Oslo have slightly increased (ENGM; 2019: 3.92 min/dep.; 2020: 2.68 min/dep. ;ENGM; 2021: 2.87 min/dep.). The annual average is influenced by the performance during the winter months due to de-icing. The longest additional times were observed in January and December with more than 7 min/dep.

ASMA

Additional ASMA times at Oslo (ENGM; 2019: 1.03 min/arr.; 2020: 0.64 min/arr.; 2021: 0.53 min/arr.) further decreased in 2021. These times were nearly zero between May and September averaging 0.19 min/arr. but at the end of the year these times increased again.

Share of arrivals applying continuous descent operations (CDOs) (PI#5)

Focus CDOs

All airports have very high shares of CDO flights with all airports having more than double the overall RP3 value in 2021 (30.5%). Although the monthly values decreased towards the end of the year, the yearly values have increased with respect to 2020 by 0.4-2.1 percentage points.

Airport level
Airport
Additional taxi-out time (PI#3)
Additional ASMA time (PI#4)
Share of arrivals applying CDO (PI#5)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Bergen/Flesland NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 80% 80% NA NA NA
Oslo/Gardermoen 2.68 2.87 NA NA NA 0.64 0.53 NA NA NA 62% 64% NA NA NA
Stavanger/Sola NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 76% 74% NA NA NA
Trondheim/Vaernes NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 77% 79% NA NA NA

Civil-Military dimension

Focus on Civil-Military dimension

Update on Military dimension of the plan

LARA has been implemented and Civil/Military Airspace Committee maintain a continued focus on the effectiveness of the booking procedures. The AMC procedure has been revised establishing new and larger areas in southern Norway with a design that is optimized to cater to civilian traffic flows. The civil/military airspace continually work on optimizing the airspace structure to minimize the impact of military air operations on civilian air traffic. LARA has been deployed to both civil and military users and further integration into the ATM system is ongoing.

Military - related measures implemented or planned to improve capacity

The civil/military airspace continually work on optimizing the airspace structure to minimize the impact of military air operations on civilian air traffic. LARA has been deployed to both civil and military users and further integration into the ATM system is ongoing.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#6

The civil/military airspace continually work on optimizing the airspace structure to minimize the impact of military air operations on civilian air traffic. LARA has been deployed to both civil and military users and further integration into the ATM system is ongoing.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#7

No data available.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#8

No data available.

 
  • © European Union, 2025

  • Disclaimer

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission