• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • About
  • Download
  • Publications
  1. Environment
  • Year report
    • 2023 ✓
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020

  • Lithuania
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Occurrences

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Environment - Lithuania

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Lithuania achieved a KEA performance of 13.14% compared to its target of 1.92% and did not contribute positively towards achieving the Union-wide target.

▪ The NSA states that the KEA deterioration was due to significant route extensions as a result of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. The NSA also highlights that Lithuania’s geographical location is a barrier to environmental performance.

▪ SCR and KEP worsened compared to 2022.

▪ Lithuania has no airports that are regulated under the performance and charging scheme.

En route performance

Horizontal flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) (KPI#1), of the last filed flight plan (KEP) (PI#1) & shortest constrained route (SCR) (PI#2)

Civil-Military dimension

Focus on Civil-Military dimension

Update on Military dimension of the plan

Due to increased MIL activity in the region impact on environmental KPA is significant (to negative side). Airspace design is under revision to support current and future MIL activity, new TSA type areas are designed for MIL operations. FUA principles are applied for day-to-day airspace managemet, procedures are implemented based on LoA with ASM tool LARA in use between CIV-MIL.
New Modular (Temporary) TSAs were created, with focus on testing more flexible ways of area activation (tactical activation for MIL not affecting CIVIL, based on LoA). Testing will last till 31-OCT-2024. If results will be satisfactory, Temporary areas will be converted to permanent TSAs.

Military - related measures implemented or planned to improve capacity

New modular TSAs with more dynamic/flexible ways of management could potentialy reduce airspace capacity issues or at least balace military and civil airspace needs (this model is under testing). INTEL/SURVEILANCE flights most propably will remain, ANSP has no authority to regulating this part of MIL operations.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#6

ON is implementing latest version of LARA (v 4.0) to improve the related performance.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#7

ON is implementing latest version of LARA (v 4.0) to improve the related performance.

Initiatives implemented or planned to improve PI#8

ON is implementing latest version of LARA (v 4.0) to improve the related performance.

 
  • © European Union, 2024

  • Disclaimer

  • [email protected]

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission