• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • Investments
    • SES RP3

    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • About
  • Download
  • Data Portal
  • Publications
  1. Cost-efficiency
  • Year report
    • RP3
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021 ✓
    • 2020

  • Austria
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Safety occurrences
      • Runway incursions
      • Separation minima infringements
      • Occurrences reporting
    • ASDRS

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Cost-efficiency - Austria

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ The en route 2020/2021 actual unit cost of Austria was 104.43 €2017, -4.4% lower than the determined unit cost (109.28 €2017). The terminal actual unit cost was 407.72 €2017, -0.9% lower than the determined unit cost (411.29 €2017).

▪ The en route 2021 actual service units (1,799K) were in line with the determined service units (1,807K).

▪ The en route 2021 actual total costs were -17 M€2017 (-8.7%) lower than determined. The main decreases were attributable to staff (-9.3 M€2017, or -7.5%) and other operating costs (-4.7 M€2017, or -14%). The NSA explained that costs variations were mainly due to residual effects from cost savings in 2020 and the prolonged situation of COVID-19.

▪ Austro Control spent 29 M€2017 in 2021 related to costs of investments, -11% less than determined (33 M€2017). Some investments were delayed due to the prolonged COVID-19 situation.

▪ The discrepancies regarding total costs and costs of investments are significant, especially as the performance plan has been submitted at the end of 2021. The PRB invites the NSA to analyse the discrepancies and identify their reasons, including potential inaccurate planning and possible misusing of the regulatory framework to finance the liquidity.

▪ The en route actual unit cost incurred by users in 2020/2021 was 112.01€, while the terminal actual unit cost incurred by users was 428.53€.

En route charging zone

Unit cost (KPI#1)

Actual and determined data
Total costs - nominal (M€) 2020-2021 2022 2023 2024
Actual costs 363 NA NA NA
Determined costs 381 202 196 196
Difference costs -17 NA NA NA
Inflation assumptions 2020-2021 2022 2023 2024
Determined inflation rate NA 2.5% 2.0% 2.0%
Determined inflation index NA 110.3 112.5 114.8
Actual inflation rate NA NA NA NA
Actual inflation index NA NA NA NA
Difference inflation index (p.p.) NA NA NA NA
Focus on unit cost

AUC vs. DUC

In the combined year 2020-2021, the AUC was -4.4% (or -4.85 €2017) lower than the planned DUC. This results from the combination of slightly lower than planned TSUs
(-0.2%) and lower than planned en route costs in real terms (-4.6%, or -16.8 M€2017).

En route service units

The difference between actual and planned TSUs (-0.2%) falls within the ±2% dead band. Hence the resulting loss of revenue is borne by the ANSP.

En route costs by entity

Actual real en route costs are -4.6% (-16.8 M€2017) lower than planned. This is mainly driven by the lower costs of the main ANSP - Austro Control (-4.7%, or -14.9 M€2017 for ATM/CNS/AIS and SAR services) and (-3.3%, or -0.8 M€2017 for meteorological services). NSA/EUROCONTROL costs were -4.6% lower than planned.

En route costs for the main ANSP at charging zone level

The lower than planned en route costs in real terms for Austro Control (-4.7%, or -14.9 M€2017, excluding the costs for meteorological services) result from:
- lower staff costs (-4.5%); “due to cost containment measures of Austria including reduction of overtime, salary and hiring freeze and one time effects such as short time”;
- lower other operating costs (-7.3%); “due to cost containment measures of Austria such as reduction of travel expenses, non-operational training and much more”;
- lower depreciation (-3.9%) and cost of capital (-12.2%) reflecting delayed investments due to the impact of COVID-19; and,
- slightly higher than planned deduction for VFR exempted flights (+1.2%).

Actual unit cost incurred by the users (AUCU) (PI#1)

AUCU components (€/SU) – 2020-2021
Components of the AUCU in 2020-2021 €/SU
DUC 114.85
Inflation adjustment 0.17
Cost exempt from cost-sharing -3.04
Traffic risk sharing adjustment 0.00
Traffic adj. (costs not TRS) 0.03
Finantial incentives 0.00
Modulation of charges 0.00
Cross-financing 0.00
Other revenues 0.00
Application of lower unit rate 0.00
Total adjustments -2.84
AUCU 112.01
AUCU vs. DUC -2.5%
Cost exempt from cost sharing by item - 2020-2021 €'000 €/SU
New and existing investments -2,755.9 -0.83
Competent authorities and qualified entities costs -247.4 -0.07
Eurocontrol costs -910.3 -0.28
Pension costs -6,146.1 -1.86
Interest on loans 0.0 0.00
Changes in law 0.0 0.00
Total cost exempt from cost risk sharing -10,059.8 -3.04
Focus on AUCU

The actual en route unit cost incurred by airspace users (AUCU) in respect of activities performed in the combined year 2020-2021 (112.01€) is -2.5% lower than the nominal DUC (114.85€) which includes DUC initially charged: 63.56€; and to be charged: 51.28€. The difference between these two figures (-2.84€/SU) is due to:
- the positive inflation adjustment resulting from higher than planned inflation (+0.17€/SU);
- the impact of adjustments resulting from the costs exempt from cost-sharing mechanism (-3.04€/SU); and,
- the positive traffic adjustment (+0.03€/SU) for the costs not subject to traffic risk sharing to be charged in future years.

The share of regulatory result in the AUCU (before the deduction of other revenues) is 2.6%.

Regulatory result (RR)

Focus on regulatory result

Austro Control net gain on activity in Austrian en route charging zone in the combined year 2020-2021
Austro Control generated a net gain of +6.4 M€, resulting from a gain of +7.1 M€ arising from the cost sharing mechanism and a loss of -0.7 M€ arising from the traffic risk sharing mechanism.
Austro Control overall regulatory results (RR) for the en route activity (see Note 2 above)
Ex-post, the overall RR taking into account the net gain from the en route activity mentioned above (+6.4 M€) and the actual RoE (+2.3 M€) amounts to +8.6 M€ (2.7% of the en route revenues). The resulting ex-post rate of return on equity is 27.9%, which is significantly higher than the 7.3% planned in the PP.

 
  • © European Union, 2025

  • Disclaimer

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission