• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • About
  • Download
  • Publications
  1. Capacity
  • Year report
    • 2023
    • 2022 ✓
    • 2021
    • 2020

  • Spain
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Occurrences

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ - Spain Continental
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • En route CZ - Spain Canarias
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Capacity - Spain

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Spain registered 0.34 minutes of average en route ATFM delay per flight during 2022, which has been adjusted to 0.30 during the post-ops adjustment process, thus not achieving the local target value of 0.20. Spain registered 0.34 minutes of average en route ATFM delay per flight during 2022, which has been adjusted to 0.30 during the post-ops adjustment process, thus not achieving the local target value of 0.20.

▪ The average number of IFR movements was 8% below 2019 levels in Spain in 2022.

▪ The number of ATCOs in OPS is planned to remain the same in Canarias ACC, while a decrease in the numbers is planned in all the other ACCs by the end of RP3. The actual values followed the 2022 plan in Barcelona and Sevilla ACCs, while in Canarias, Madrid, and Palma ACCs they were higher than the 2022 plan.

▪ Given that ATC capacity appears to be a continuing issue at Spanish ACCs, the planned number of ATCOs in OPS may need to be revised upwards.

▪ Delays were highest between June and December, mostly due to ATC Capacity issues and adverse weather conditions.

▪ The share of delayed flights with delays longer than 15 minutes in Spain increased by 5.01 p.p. compared to 2021 and was lower than 2019 values.

▪ The yearly total of sector opening hours in Barcelona ACC was 56,939 in 2022, showing a 51.5% increase compared to 2021. Sector opening hours are 5.7% below 2019 levels. The yearly total of sector opening hours in Madrid ACC was 92,490 in 2022, showing a 50.1% increase compared to 2021. Sector opening hours are 10.3% below 2019 levels. The yearly total of sector opening hours in Palma ACC was 37,197 in 2022, showing a 19.9% increase compared to 2021. Sector opening hours are 3.9% below 2019 levels. The yearly total of sector opening hours in Sevilla ACC was 38,559 in 2022, showing a 26.9% increase compared to 2021. Sector opening hours are 6.2% below 2019 levels.

▪ Barcelona ACC registered 15.36 IFR movements per one sector opening hour in 2022, being 1.3% below 2019 levels. Madrid ACC registered 11.64 IFR movements per one sector opening hour in 2022, being 1.9% over 2019 levels. Palma ACC registered 8.96 IFR movements per one sector opening hour in 2022, being 7.3% over 2019 levels. Sevilla ACC registered 11.43 IFR movements per one sector opening hour in 2022, being 9.3% over 2019 levels.

En route performance

En route ATFM delay (KPI#1)

Focus on en route ATFM delay

Summary of capacity performance

Spain experienced an increase in traffic from 1 192k flights in 2021 to 1 983k flights in 2022. However, traffic levels were still below the 2 152k flights in 2019.

In 2022, Spain had 598k minutes of ATFM delay - 68% attributed to ATC capacity; 24% attributed to adverse weather and 7% attributed to ‘Other’.

There were an additional 63k minutes of en route ATFM delay originating in the Spanish ACCs that were re-attributed to adjacent ANSPs via the NM post operations delay attribution process:
- 43k minutes of en route ATFM delay were re-attributed to DSNA, according to the NMB agreement for eNM/S22 measures, to ameliorate capacity shortfalls in Reims ACC.
- 20k minutes of delay were re-attributed to NAV Portugal due to implementation of the TOPSKY ATM system in Portugal.
- A further 15k minutes of delay originated in Spain when airspace was closed due to the possible re-entry of a Chinese space rocket on 4th November 2022.

NSA’s assessment of capacity performance

KPI1: the en route capacity target has not been met.

By 2022 the minutes reallocated by network measures (eNM/22), Topsky implementation and approved Post-Ops cases have been taken into account, therefore the actual value for 2022 is 0,30 instead of 0,34. None of the reallocated minutes of delay are related to the exceptional event relating to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, in the case of Spain.

In the first part of the year 2022, the delay was more moderate and traffic had not exceeded pre-pandemic levels in all ACCs.

From July onwards, with the reactivation of traffic and the development of the high season in most ACCs, more delay minutes were generated, concluding the year with their non-compliance.

Delays were mainly caused by C-ATC Capacity (69% of the 2022 total) and W-Weather (25% of the 2022 total).

At GCCC [Canarias ACC], the splitting of the GCCCRNE sector since July, whose transition process has been extended until the end of the year, is expected to improve operations from 2023 onwards.

At LECB [BarcelonaACC], weather accounts for almost half of the delay. In LECM and LECS, most of the delay is due to C-ATC Capacity.

In LECP [Palma ACC], the delay is mainly concentrated in Jul-Aug due to C-ATC Capacity. In Oct-Nov there was some impact due to the implementation of Topsky in Portugal in GCCC, LECM and LECS [Sevilla ACC].

Monitoring process for capacity performance

The AESA Monitoring Process continues to monitor this indicator on a monthly basis taking into account the different causes of delay, since the incentive system implemented for RP3 considers a mechanism modulated by causes of delay. The evolution of the attributable and non-attributable delay causes is monitored in order to apply the incentive mechanism and to identify the reasons in the event of non-compliance.

The alert mechanism continues to be active to warn, months before the end of the year, of possible non-compliance. In 2022 this mechanism was activated to report to the Commission the expected non-compliance of this indicator, which finally occurred.

Capacity planning

The NOP Recovery Plan was the NOP structured plan adapted since 2020 (COVID-19 crisis), updated every week, initially covering an outlook of four weeks and later reconverted into the NOP Rolling Seasonal Plan covering an outlook of six weeks. The time horizon and frequency of the updates is regularly reviewed.

Every week ENAIRE updated data to the plan (planned sector openings, maximum possible sector openings, sector capacity reductions if any, availability of support to operations staff, additional information -e.g. other constraints to be highlighted- and special events and major projects). The plan is a living document regularly updated and published by NM in order to be adapted to the changed conditions of the Air Navigation Service.

Also a NOP for the 2022-2026 period was elaborated. This is the current status of the main projects included in ESPP3 planned for 2022 (included in the NOP too) and some additional information over the planned projects for 2023:
• ALL ACCs: ATFCM measures (continuous); Optimized sector configurations and sector capacities (continuous); iTEC 4.1 - TTM, Complexity Manager, MTCD and Stripless En-route (ongoing); contained ATCOS increase (in progress); IMPACT V2 - Flows complexity monitoring (concluded in 2023); iCMON - Conformance monitor (planned 2023); STAM (planned 2023).
• PALMA ACC: Split Menorca - MXX (completed in 2023).
• CANARIAS ACC: FRA (ongoing); Morocco interface (ongoing); Splitting of NE sector and cluster; RNAV1 in GCTS - NIVARIA (planned 2023).
• MADRID ACC: FRA (ongoing).
• SEVILLA ACC: FRA (ongoing); Improvement of operation mode TWR-APP LEMG (Ongoing); MIDAS - Málaga APP - impacting en-route (planned 2023); Redesign of MAR sector - MIDAS - SEVILLA (planned 2023).
• BARCELONA ACC: FRA (Ongoing); Splitting of Balse Sector (completed in 2023).

Application of Corrective Measures for Capacity (if applicable)

While in LECB {Barcelona ACC] the delay due to W-Weather accounted for 45% of the total in the ACC and therefore a very significant contribution, in LECM [Madrid ACC] and LECS [Sevilla ACC] the delay due to C-ATC Capacity accounted for 79% and 87%, respectively.

Compared to 2019, the high records of delay in LECP [Palma ACC] and LECS in summer stand out, these are the ACCs that have reached pre-pandemic traffic levels more quickly.
• LECB: Some action as planned LECBBAS split with significant contribution to increase capacity in this bottleneck sector, has not yet taken in place.
• GCCC [Canarias ACC]: The GCCCRNE sector split introduced in July 2022 has not yet been put to use in Canarias’ high season (November to February), but it is though this project will provide important capacity increase in Canarias.
• LECM: The ZAR-TER split will improve the situation, but further work will be required to increase capacity in the upper sectors. A possible way forward being evaluated is the creation of super-high sectors in all the ACC.
• LECP : Some action as split of LECPMXX have not yet been implemented but it will provide a significant increase capacity in the bottleneck sector in LECP.
• LECS: Is still pending on implementation the redesign of the sectors feeding Malaga (MA4 and neighbouring airspaces), together with new approach procedures (trombone-based) for LEMG, will provide a very important benefit in terms of capacity both in Sevilla ACC and in Malaga airport approach.

Summer 2022 was more complex than 2019 and and on-time performance was poor. In particular noted that LECS and LECP were two of the few ACCs in which traffic exceeded the pre-pandemic levels. Flight, airport and air traffic operations all suffered from volatility of demand, in general.

Weather regulations were particularly volatile in 2022. And in the case of Spain the percentage of the annual ATFM delay due to weather increased over the 2019 percentage value of the whole annual ATFM delay figures. Other circumstances could be new distribution of traffic flows due to changes in the en-route unit rates and to the resumption of flight traffic to and from Morocco after their alleviation of COVID measures.

NSA recommendations to the ANSP to rectify situation

Endorse ENAIRE to continue implementing the capacity plan to achieve the objectives of delay and better air traffic management, focusing on projects that have an impact on increasing available capacity as well as implementing projects that improve operations to handle increases in traffic above pre-pandemic levels.

Capacity projects already achieved by ANSP include:

Continued effort to increase staffing levels and/or availability in Madrid ACC and Barcelona ACC;
Continued alignment of traffic demand and sector opening times in Madrid ACC and Barcelona ACC;
Revision of sector capacities in Madrid ACC and Barcelona ACC;
Network weather mitigation measures in Barcelona ACC.

Capacity projects that remain ongoing include:
France / Spain airspace restructuring project and re-sectorisation in Barcelona ACC and Madrid ACC [2022-2024];
Participation in the Operational Excellence Program of EUROCONTROL (Barcelona ACC and Madrid ACC) [2022-2023].

Additional comments from NSA

AESA is aware that there is a certain risk of not meeting the performance target in 2023 given the degree of seasonality that exists in some units. The various monitoring activities will continue, monthly and annual monitoring, as well as periodic monitoring of the assignment of delay causes in order to know the evolution of the KPIs and the specific characteristics of each unit.

This results in a better knowledge of the behaviour of the indicators and a fluid communication and coordination with the ANSP. Additionally, AESA is monitoring the cases reported by our ANSP through the Post-OPS performance adjustment process, collaborating with both ANSPs and other stakeholders with the aim of deepening the analysis of the cases.

As the year progresses and especially as the summer season unfolds, with the existing follow-up mechanisms thanks to various monitoring and alert system in force, if this risk of non-compliance materializes, it will be notified to the Commission as established in the Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

Other indicators

Focus on ATCOs in operations

“Number of additional ATCOs in OPS planned to start working in the OPS room (FTEs)” it’s been considered all the operative ATCOs (C4) who started working for all reasons: CMCD, transfer, secondment, article 88 (II ATCOs collective bargaining agreement), new recruitments, unpaid leave return (voluntary or without job post reservation), change of designation, etc.

“Number of ATCOs in OPS planned to stop working in the OPS room (FTEs)” it’s been considered all the operative ATCOs (C4) who stopped working for all reasons: retirements, RAE or RA concessions, dismissals, CMCD, transfer, end of a secondment, end of article 88 application, voluntary unpaid leave, change of designation, etc.

In the versions previously submitted, the following criterion was considered:

Number of additional ATCOs in OPS who have started working in the OPS room (FTEs): New ATCOs in ENAIRE and ATCOs who have moved to the ACCs by CMCD during the year. Incorporated ATCOs are considered.

Number of ATCOs in OPS who have stopped working in the OPS room (FTEs): For operative ATCOs (C4), retirements, dismissals (permanent disabilities, deaths, voluntary leaves, etc.) and RA concessions are considered.

Terminal performance

Arrival ATFM delay (KPI#2)

Focus on arrival ATFM delay

Spain includes seven airports under RP3 monitoring. However in accordance with IR (EU) 2019/317 and the traffic figures, Ibiza is not monitored for pre-departure delays.
The Airport Operator Data Flow, necessary for the monitoring of these pre-departure delays, is correctly implemented where required. Nevertheless, the quality of the reporting from 3 of the 6 the Spanish airports does not allow for the calculation of the ATC pre-departure delay, with more than 60% of the reported delay not allocated to any cause.
Traffic at the ensemble of Spanish airports under monitoring in 2022 is still 10% lower than in 2019, but 60% higher than in 2021. Palma and Ibiza surpassed in 2022 the 2019 traffic.

Average arrival ATFM delays in 2022 was 0.48 min/arr, compared to 0.19 min/arr in 2021.
ATFM slot adherence has improved (2022: 97.9%; 2021: 97.2%).

The national average arrival ATFM delay at Spanish airports in 2022 was 0.48 min/arr., an increase with respect to the 2021 value (0.19 min/arr) but still lower than the 2019 value (1.02 min/arr). The increase at national level was driven by the worsening of the performance at Palma (LEPA: 2020: 0.05 min/arr; 2021: 0.29 min/arr; 2022: 1.13 min/arr) followed by Barcelona (LEBL: 2020: 0.12 min/arr; 2021: 0.06 min/arr; 2022: 0.52 min/arr) and to some extent Ibiza (LEIB: 2020: 0 min/arr; 2021: 0.09 min/arr; 2022: 0.4 min/arr) . Madrid, Malaga and Gran Canaria also observed a slight deterioration.
54% of the delays at Spanish airports were attributed to Weather (mostly at Barcelona and Palma) and 26% to ATC Capacity (mostly at Madrid and Palma).

According to the Spanish monitoring report: In the first part of the year, the delay was very moderate except in LEMG, which suffered two days with important W-Weather delays that increased its indicator. From July onwards, with the reactivation of traffic and the development of the high season in most airports, more delay minutes were generated. Delays were mainly caused by W-Weather (54% of the 2022 total) considering that almost half of those minutes were due to delays at LEPA in summer and one third at LEBL also in summer. 26% of the delay were attributed to C-ATC Capacity, half in LEMD and half in LEPA. The rest of the delay causes are less than 8%.
Regarding the particularity of the LEAL and LEIB airports, in which different ANSPs are involved, for 2022, as for 2021 and 2020, it is not necessary to make a breakdown between ENAIRE and Skyway delays, since the incentive scheme is not applicable to these years. However, from 2023 onwards it will be necessary to differentiate this value for both aerodromes for incentive purposes.
In any case, for 2022 and according the document “Monitoring of delays in arrivals in RP3 for Alicante and Ibiza airports” prepared by AESA, the part of delay that would correspond to ENAIRE or Skyway (previously FerroNATS) for these two airports would be as follows:
- Alicante: 0,00 min/flight (ENAIRE and Skyway). In post-ops phase a delay was reallocated to en-route leading to a decrease from the initial value of 0,03 to a final value of 0,00 after post-ops.
- Ibiza: 0,14 min/flight (ENAIRE) and 0,26 min/flight (Skyway)


Concerning Russia’s war: Significant variations in traffic flows have been observed in 2021-2022, but it is difficult to identify Russia’s war against Ukraine as the main causal factor.3. Arrival ATFM Delay – National TargetThe national target on arrival ATFM delay in 2022 was met.
According to the Spanish monitoring report: No particular risk of non-compliance with the KPI is expected, but given the degree of seasonality that exists in some units, the various monitoring activities will continue, monthly and annual monitoring, as well as periodic monitoring of the assignment of delay causes in order to know the evolution of the KPIs and the specific characteristics of each unit. This results in a better knowledge of the behaviour of the indicators and a fluid communication and coordination with the ANSP. Additionally, AESA is monitoring the cases reported by our ANSP through the Post-Ops performance adjustment process, collaborating with both ANSPs and other stakeholders with the aim of deepening the analysis of the cases.

As the year progresses and especially as the summer season unfolds, with the existing follow-up mechanisms thanks to various monitoring and alert system in force, if this risk of non-compliance materializes, it will be notified to the Commission as established in the Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

All Spanish airports showed adherence above 95% and the national average was 97.9%, a small improvement with respect to 2021’s performance (97.2%). With regard to the 2.1% of flights that did not adhere, 1.2% was early and 0.9% was late.

The Spanish monitoring reports adds: The result for 2022 (aggregate of the 7 airports subject to monitoring) improves by 0,7% the result of the previous year, being all results well above the value of 80% set in Regulation (EU) No. 255/2010 of the Commission . ANSPs does not believe it is necessary to establish specific improvement measures.
This PI is being monitored by AESA twice a year to evaluate the evolution of the indicators. If significant deviations are found, the possible causes will be analysed by contacting the relevant stakeholder.

Other terminal performance indicators (PI#1-3)

Airport level
Airport name
Avg arrival ATFM delay (KPI#2)
Slot adherence (PI#1)
ATC pre departure delay (PI#2)
All causes pre departure delay (PI#3)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2020 2021 2022 2023 2020 2021 2022 2023 2020 2021 2022 2023
Alicante 0.02 0.00 0.00 NA 98.8% 99.7% 99.1% NA% 0.23 0.23 0.51 NA 9.0 8.1 17.4 NA
Barcelona 0.12 0.06 0.52 NA 94.9% 98.7% 99.0% NA% 0.00 0.04 0.09 NA 8.7 8.3 15.8 NA
Ibiza NA 0.09 0.40 NA 99.0% 98.6% 99.1% NA% NA NA 0.00 NA 6.3 9.1 19.7 NA
Las Palmas 0.97 0.44 0.46 NA 96.4% 95.5% 98.3% NA% 0.08 0.05 0.29 NA 11.3 9.4 15.0 NA
Madrid/Barajas 0.49 0.27 0.35 NA 94.2% 96.6% 97.4% NA% NA NA 0.04 NA 9.5 9.7 13.1 NA
Malaga 0.01 0.02 0.11 NA 93.4% 95.0% 95.2% NA% 0.18 NA 0.52 NA 11.3 10.9 19.1 NA
Palma De Mallorca 0.05 0.29 1.13 NA 97.3% 96.8% 97.9% NA% NA NA 0.30 NA 5.4 8.2 20.0 NA
Focus on performance indicators at airport level

ATFM slot adherence

The calculation of the ATC pre-departure delay is based on the data provided by the airport operators through the Airport Operator Data Flow (APDF) which is properly implemented at all 6 Spanish airports subject to monitoring of this indicator.
However, there are several quality checks before EUROCONTROL can produce the final value which is established as the average minutes of pre-departure delay (delay in the actual off block time) associated to the IATA delay code 89 (through the APDF, for each delayed flight, the reasons for that delay have to be transmitted and coded according to IATA delay codes.
However, sometimes the airport operator has no information concerning the reasons for the delay in the off block, or they cannot convert the reasons to the IATA delay codes. In those cases, the airport operator might:
- Not report any information about the reasons for the delay for that flight (unreported delay)
- Report a special code to indicate they do not have the information (code ZZZ)
- Report a special code to indicate they do not have the means to collect and/or translate the information (code 999)
To be able to calculate with a minimum of accuracy the PI for a given month, the minutes of delay that are not attributed to any IATA code reason should not exceed 40% of the total minutes of pre-departure delay observed at the airport.
Finally, to be able to produce the annual figure, at least 10 months of valid data is requested by EUROCONTROL.
The high share of unidentified delay reported by Barcelona, Madrid and Palma prevents the calculation of this indicator for these three airports. At the rest of airports the quality of the data reporting in 2022 allowed for this calculation.
The Spanish monitoring report includes some analysis on the monthly values that could be calculated:

According to the Spanish monitoring report: GCLP, LEAL, LEMG and LEPA have improved in reporting because there is more monthly data in 2022 than there was in 2021. While LEBL, LEMD and LEIB have only reported data one month.
Although LEIB does not yet reach >80k movements, it is monitored together with these 6 airports since it is one of the airports considered in the Spanish performance plan (ESPP3) for RP3.
This PI is being monitored by AESA twice a year to evaluate the evolution of the indicators. If significant deviations are found, the possible causes will be analysed by contacting the relevant stakeholder.


The Spanish monitoring report includes some analysis on the monthly values that could be calculated: After several communications with the airport manager, AESA has understood that codes ZZZ and 999 are generally assigned when no code has been given (and therefore the cause of the delay is not known) or when the actual delay does not match the declared delay. The indicator picks up the initial declared delay data but this is subject to change and so there are occasions when it does not match the actual delay. This is why there is so much indeterminacy represented by these ZZZ and 999 codes.
There does not seem to be a simple resolution to this situation since the data needed to publish the indicator is collected around the middle of the following month and the process of defining the codes that are more in line with reality is done through a post-operational analysis that takes considerably longer.

ATC pre-departure delay

The total (all causes) delay in the actual off block time at Spanish airports in 2022 increased significantly at all airports. The highest pre-departure delays were observed at Palma (LEPA: 2020: 5.44 min/arr; 8.20 min/arr; 2022: 19.98 min/dep) and Malaga (LEMG: 2020: 11.33 min/arr; 10.86 min/arr; 2022: 19.14 min/dep). The worst delays per flight at these airports were observed in Summer, except for Gran Canaria where the highest delays were registered in December.

According to the Spanish monitoring report: The 2022 values are higher than the 2020-2021 values. The evolution of the indicator throughout 2022 is upward in the first half of the year and then remains stable until the end of the year, this behaviour is given in the 7 airports considered in ESPP3. The aggregated result for 2022 (of the 6 airports subject to monitoring) is 16,20 min/dep, which worsens significantly compared to 2021 (9,09 min/dep).

The indicator could be directly related to the traffic in arrivals. It would be logical that this type of delay would increase when the number of movements grows. However the historical series with only 3 years (2020-2022) is very small because 2020-2021 are special years and therefore the behaviour of 2022, being only one year, might not be extrapolable for future years. Therefore, for the time being, no conclusions will be drawn regarding this indicator.

This PI is being monitored by AESA twice a year to evaluate the evolution of the indicators. If significant deviations are found, the possible causes will be analysed by contacting the relevant stakeholder.

All causes pre-departure delay

No data available: airport operator data flow not established, or more than two months of missing / non-validated data

 
  • © European Union, 2024

  • Disclaimer

  • [email protected]

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission