• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • About
  • Download
  • Publications
  1. Capacity
  • Year report
    • 2023
    • 2022 ✓
    • 2021
    • 2020

  • Portugal
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Occurrences

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Capacity - Portugal

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Portugal registered 0.63 minutes of average en route ATFM delay per flight during 2022, which has been adjusted to 0.67 during the post-ops adjustment process, thus not achieving the local target value of 0.13.

▪ The average number of IFR movements was 6% below 2019 levels in Portugal in 2022.

▪ A 25% increase in the number of ATCOs in OPS is expected by the end of RP3. The actual value remained below the 2022 plan in Lisbon ACC.

▪ The system transition in Lisbon ACC was the key reason behind delays in Portugal in 2022.

▪ Delays were highest between April and October, mostly due to ATC Capacity and adverse weather conditions.

▪ The share of delayed flights with delays longer than 15 minutes in Portugal increased by 16.23 p.p. compared to 2021 and was higher than 2019 values.

▪ The yearly total of sector opening hours in Lisbon ACC was 33,129 in 2022, showing a 2.1% increase compared to 2021. Sector opening hours are 6.5% below 2019 levels.

▪ Lisbon ACC registered 19.33 IFR movements per one sector opening hour in 2022, being 0.4% above 2019 levels.

En route performance

En route ATFM delay (KPI#1)

Focus on en route ATFM delay

Summary of capacity performance

Portugal experienced an increase in traffic from 345k flights in 2021 to 610k flights in 2022. However, traffic levels were still below the 651k flights in 2019.

In 2022, Lisboa ACC had 404k minutes of en route ATFM delay 79% of which were attributed to ‘Special event’ & ‘Other’ - the implementation of TOPSKY ATM system. 17% of ATFM delays were attributed to ATC capacity and the remaining 4% of ATFM delays were attributed to ATC equipment.

The en route delay figures reported above include circa 20k minutes of en route ATFM delay, re-attributed from ENAIRE, under the NM post operations relay attribution process, due to capacity constraints, in Spain, stemming from the implementation of the TOPSKY project in Portugal.

NSA’s assessment of capacity performance

2022 was the much expected recovery year from the covid-19 pandemic. Traffic levels recovered to levels close to 2019, especially in the summer and year-end. Specifically, in Lisbon FIR, traffic recovered by 76%, when compared to 2021, but remained 6,3% below 2019 levels.

Further to the recovery in traffic, in Portugal ANS was marked by the change in the ATM System, that after some delays due to the COVID pandemic, was finally ready by October 2022. The transition to the new ATM system, was planned with the objective of maintaining the highest traffic levels that could be managed safely . As such, capacity reduction was kept to a minimum, with a direct impact in terms of delays.

The capacity KPI for en-route was highly affected by the implementation of the new ATM system in October, and the preparatory work that came with it. The new system implementation was carefully planned and prepared with 2 key objectives, assuring all the safety conditions, and at the same time minimize the impact at the network level and on users.

Unfortunately, the process had a significant toll in terms of delays in the Lisbon FIR, and at the Lisbon airport, which were the most affected by the process, leading to a non-compliance of both en-route and terminal delay targets

Monitoring process for capacity performance

NAV Portugal and ANAC have a capacity monitoring process in place that consists of quarterly reports and follow-up meetings to monitor and present corrective measures whenever necessary.

In particular in 2022, ANAC closely supervised the implementation of the new ATM System (TopSky), the measures taken to insure safety, and to minimize its impact in the overall system.

Capacity planning

Regarding the ATFM En Route delay, the KPI’s performance was particularly affected by the implementation of the new TOPSKY system, in NAV Portugal, which influenced the final value of the KPI (0.63min/flight )- well above the target for 2022 (0.13min/flight).

Nevertheless, discounting the causes associated with the implementation of TOPSKY, the ATFM en-route delay would have been approx. 0.15min/flight. Finally, It must be mentioned that the all process of TOPSKY’s implementation has been coordinated with the most critical stakeholders like the: NM, Airspace users, Airports and NSA in order to minimize the impact of this transition at network and local level.

Application of Corrective Measures for Capacity (if applicable)

The implementation process of the new ATM system (TOPSKY), namely during the months of July, October and November, originated capacity constraints and consequently additional delays that significantly degraded this indicator. It should be noted that the entire operation in 2022 was impacted by the TOPSY implementation process, which required a very strict management of resources in order to respond as efficiently as possible to the training needs of Air Traffic Controllers (ATCO), the customization and parameterization of the system and the daily operation in the various ATC units.

The implementation of the TOPSKY system, previously scheduled for the month of March, was initially postponed to 26 September after talks with the Network Manager (NM), in order to minimize the impacts on the European network (EATMN), due to the overlap with the implementation of the 4FLIGHT ATM system in Reims (France). In this way it was possible to mitigate the impacts on the European network during the summer period.

However, the adverse side effect of this decision was the need to prolong the shadow operation in order to keep the ATCOs in a state of readiness adequate for the final phase of the ATM system transition, with the consequent challenges referred to above.

The transition plan was duly coordinated by the ANSP with ANAC, the air operators and the NM, with the latter highlighting NAV Portugal’s availability to accommodate the new planning.

It should be noted in this regard that this new plan, scheduled to begin on September the 26th, contemplated 8 weeks for the final transition, a very demanding and ambitious period, compared to other identical processes. As an example, the transition to the 4FLIGHT system in Reims involved 6 months of air traffic restrictions and the implementation of TOPSKY in Prague 8 months of restrictions.

However, also this second plan suffered changes at the request of several air operators, especially those operating from Lisbon. Once again, the ANSP, trying as much as possible to minimize the impacts of ATM system transition, delayed the beginning of the final phase of transition by three weeks, to October 18th, bringing it as close as possible to IATA winter and, additionally, shortening it by two weeks, proposing to carry out the final phase of transition in only 6 weeks, with increments of capacity in each week.

Additionally, throughout the final phase of transition, in order to mitigate the impacts of a significant capacity decrease in the Lisbon FIR, all ATCOs were mobilized for the operation in order to allow the opening of the maximum number of sectors, accommodating higher traffic demand and reducing the need for restrictions.

Finally, it should be noted that the transition to a new ATM system is a highly complex process that requires the management of a wide set of variables and it is not possible to shorten the steps and time required to build confidence in the system, nor is it possible to offer more capacity than can be provided while ensuring the safety of air operations.

Other measures were implemented, including the issuing of a Ministerial Order derogating temporarily and to a limited extent, the restrictions to Lisbon airport operations between 00H00/02H00 and 05H00/06H00 (night curfew), during the critical period of reduction in the capacity derived from the final transition phase to the new ATM system.

As this was a one-off situation, there are no specific recommendations to the ANSP.

Other indicators

Focus on ATCOs in operations

The current gap between the number of ATCOs planned and those that actually entered is mainly the result of two factors. The first, still relates with the impact of COVID which forced the interruption of the training cycle and as such delayed the entry of new ATCOs in 2022. As such it was not possible to reduce this gap.

The second factor has its origin in the implementation of the new TOPSKY system in 6 different units, which forced NAV Portugal to carry out a delay period of almost an year, in the admission of new ATCOs, so that when they entered they have already been trained for the new system.

Terminal performance

Arrival ATFM delay (KPI#2)

Focus on arrival ATFM delay

The scope of RP3 monitoring for Portugal comprises 10 airports in 2020, However, in accordance with IR (EU) 2019/317 and the traffic figures, only two of these airports (Lisbon (LPPT) and Porto (LPPR)) must be monitored for pre-departure delays.
The Airport Operator Data Flow, necessary for the monitoring of these pre-departure delays, is correctly established where required and the monitoring of all capacity indicators can be performed.
Traffic at these 10 airports in 2022, after an increase of 67% versus 2021, was only 4% lower than in 2019.

Average arrival ATFM delays in 2022 was 2.31 min/arr, compared to 0.58 min/arr in 2021.
ATFM slot adherence has not changed and remains at 96,1% in 2022.

The national average arrival ATFM delay at Portuguese airports in 2022 was 2.31 min/arr, significantly higher than the 0.58 min/arr of 2021. This is driven by the deterioration of performance at Lisbon (LPPT; 2019: 4.13 min/arr; 2020: 1.72 min/arr; 2021: 0.28 min/arr; 2022: 3.96 min/arr). 33% of these delays were attributed to Aerodrome Capacity issues, 31% to Special Event (in relation to the TOPSKY implementation) and 25% to Weather.
At Porto (LPPR; 2019: 3.09 min/arr; 2020: 0.77 min/arr; 2021: 2.14 min/arr; 2022: 1,89 min/arr) delays have slightly decreased and 74% of them were attributed to weather.

According to the Portuguese monitoring report: ATFM arrival delay followed the same behaviour as the ATFM en Route delay , with several causes affecting at airport level. One of the main causes that affected Porto and Lisbon airport in 2022 was the implementation of the TOPSKY ATC system in Lisbon FIR. In the case of Lisbon the implementation of the new ATC system was responsible for 31% of all delay causes, with Weather and Aerodrome Capacity responsible for 68%. In the case of Porto, the implementation of the new ATC system contributed for 16% of all delay causes while Aerodrome capacity and weather contributed with 83%. One last remark for Madeira with 0,11 min/flight delay caused by Weather ( 0,10 min/flight) and the TOPSKY transition ( 0,01 min/flight) and Cascais with 0,36 min/flight caused by ATC capacity due to capacity restriction in Lisbon TMA since summer 2022.3. Arrival ATFM Delay – National TargetThe national target on arrival ATFM delay in 2022 was met.
According to the Portuguese monitoring report: As in the case of en-route, the implementation of the TopSky influenced significantly the performance at the Lisbon airport, where 1,22 minutes of delay/flight were due to the implementation of the new system. As for Porto airport, 1, 4 minutes of delay were associated to weather, or 75% of the delays registered.
Considering the reasons for the incompliance with the capacity targets in these airports, ANAC along 2023 is monitoring performance more closely, especially taking into account the extraordinary recovery in traffic, which is already surpassing 2029 levels.

The monitoring report mentions the following remedial measures: *The recovery in traffic levels expected to occur in the summer of 2023 to levels above the ones registered in 2019, and the level of congestion of the Lisbon airport, together pose a risk to the proposed performance targets. At the present moment weekly traffic is already above the figures of 2019. These risks have been identified and are being managed by NAV Portugal through several actions.
It is planned the implementation of the Point Merge System for Lisbon Airport, in the Winter 23/24 (training expected between October and November 2023 and implementation by February 2024), which will offer more flexibility to accommodate the traffic arriving to Lisbon during peak periods. Despite this, it should be emphasized that most of the delays at airport level in Lisbon are due to Aerodrome capacity since the airport infrastructure is at its limit.
The NSA has been supervising closely NAV Portugal’s operation, and is hosting since February a working group to work on the operational restrictions of the Lisbon airport, in order to minimize the impact of congestion.

All Portuguese airports showed adherence around or above 90%.
The national average was 96.1%. With regard to the 3.9% of flights that did not adhere, 3% was early and 0.9% was late.

Other terminal performance indicators (PI#1-3)

Airport level
Airport name
Avg arrival ATFM delay (KPI#2)
Slot adherence (PI#1)
ATC pre departure delay (PI#2)
All causes pre departure delay (PI#3)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2020 2021 2022 2023 2020 2021 2022 2023 2020 2021 2022 2023
Cascais NA NA 0.36 NA 82.6% 88.9% 94.6% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Faro 0.00 0.00 0.01 NA 95.8% 94.3% 95.3% NA% 0.09 0.58 0.57 NA 8.2 8.5 19.6 NA
Horta NA NA NA NA 93.8% 90.9% 96.1% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Lisbon 1.72 0.28 3.96 NA 96.5% 98.8% 98.7% NA% 2.14 1.22 3.22 NA 12.0 11.0 25.2 NA
Madeira NA 0.03 0.11 NA 93.2% 93.7% 92.9% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Montijo NA NA NA NA 0.0% 50.0% 37.5% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Ponta Delgada NA NA NA NA 98.2% 97.6% 97.1% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Porto 0.77 2.14 1.89 NA 93.4% 93.5% 94.1% NA% 0.26 0.25 0.44 NA 9.2 10.7 18.4 NA
Porto Santo NA NA NA NA 92.9% 97.4% 90.5% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Santa Maria NA NA NA NA 100.0% 100.0% 92.0% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Focus on performance indicators at airport level

ATFM slot adherence

The performance at Lisbon deteriorated with respect to the previous years os RP3 but remained below the delays of 2019 (LPPT; 2019: 4.16 min/dep.; 2020: 2.13 min/dep.; 2021: 1.22 min/dep.; 2022: 3.22 min/dep.) Nevertheless, like in previous years this delay is still the highest in the SES area.
The quality of the airport data reported by Porto was has improved, allowing the calculation of this indicator for this airport in 2022 and resulting in 0.44 min/dep.

According to the Portuguese monitoring report: ATC pre-departure delay Performance Indicator follows exactly the same trend as traffic growth. As traffic starts to increase in the main airports - Lisbon and Porto - ATC pre-departure delay starts to increase due to the fact that more traffic needs to be managed at ground level to keep an efficient operation at airport level. If we look back to 2019 figures, for the same period, this performance indicator shows 4,06 and 0,74 respectively for Lisbon and Porto Airport.

ATC pre-departure delay

The total (all causes) delay in the actual off block time significantly increased in 2022 at both Lisbon (LPPT: 2020: 12.02 min/dep.; 2021: 11.03 min/dep.; 2022: 25.21 min/dep.) and Porto (LPPR: 2020: 9.15 min/dep.; 2021: 10.70 min/dep.; 2022: 18,40 min/dep.)

According to the Portuguese monitoring report: This performance indicator refers to all causes affecting a flight at airport level before its departure. Several causes contribute to the performance of this indicator. According EUROCONTROL -CODA in 2022, the main contributively causes for this indicator in Lisbon were reactionary and airline delay (both 68%) and ATC (En route and Airport) 24%. Compared with 2019 figures (19,6 min/departure), the last comparable year in teams of traffic, the main increase was in reactionary and airline component, from 12,1 min/departure to 17,0 min/departure. Concerning Porto, the trend is exactly the same. Main causes are Reactionary and Airline delay responsible for 82% for all departure delay. ATC is responsible for 17% of delay (2,9 min/departure). Compared with 2019 (15,7 min/departure) ,the main increase was at reactionary and airline delay component, from 11,2 min/departure to 13,0 min/departure. On the other way around, ATC delay has a small decrease from 3,1 min/departure in 2019 to 2,9min/departure in 2022.

All causes pre-departure delay

No data available: airport operator data flow not established, or more than two months of missing / non-validated data

 
  • © European Union, 2024

  • Disclaimer

  • [email protected]

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission