• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • Investments
    • SES RP3

    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • About
  • Download
  • Data Portal
  • Publications
  1. Capacity
  • Year report
    • RP3
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022 ✓
    • 2021
    • 2020

  • Hungary
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Safety occurrences
      • Runway incursions
      • Separation minima infringements
      • Occurrences reporting
    • ASDRS

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Capacity - Hungary

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Hungary registered 0.89 minutes of average en route ATFM delay per flight during 2022 which has been adjusted to 0.54 during the post-ops adjustment process, thus not achieving the local target value of 0.11.

▪ The average number of IFR movements was 1% above 2019 levels in Hungary in 2022.

▪ The number of ATCOs in OPS is expected to increase by 12% by the end of RP3, with the actual value being below the 2022 plan in Budapest ACC.

▪ The impact of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine had a detrimental effect on capacity performance in Hungary in 2022.

▪ Delays were highest between May and September, mostly due to ATC Capacity issues.

▪ The share of delayed flights with delays longer than 15 minutes in Hungary increased by 19.4 p.p. compared to 2021 and was higher than 2019 values.

▪ The yearly total of sector opening hours in Budapest ACC was 36,864 in 2022, showing a 32.1% increase compared to 2021. Sector opening hours are 8.4% above 2019 levels.

▪ Budapest ACC registered 23.49 IFR movements per one sector opening hour in 2022, being 6.0% below 2019 levels.

▪ Hungary registered zero minutes of average airport arrival ATFM delay per flight in 2022, achieving the local target of 0.05 minutes.

▪ Compared to 2021, the number of IFR arrivals in Hungary increased by 79.59%, while arrival ATFM delay remained zero in 2022.

En route performance

En route ATFM delay (KPI#1)

Focus on en route ATFM delay

Summary of capacity performance

Hungary experienced an increase in traffic from 491k flights in 2021, with practically zero ATFM delays, to 897k flights in 2022 with 481k minutes of en route AFTM delay.

The traffic level in 2022 was higher than the 892k flights handled in 2019, which encountered treble the 2022 delays: 1.4 million minutes of ATFM delay.

There were an additional 318k minutes of en route ATFM delay originating in the Budapest ACC that were re-attributed to DFS (272k) and DSNA (46k) via the NM post operations delay attribution process, according to the NMB agreement for eNM/S22 measures, to ameliorate capacity shortfalls in both Karlsruhe UAC and Reims ACC.

NSA’s assessment of capacity performance

The Ukrainian war has had a significant impact, in both operational and economic context of the service provision of ANS in Hungary.

Operational: due to the closure of the Ukrainian airspace and the war-related sanctions, there have been reroutings in the Hungarian airspace, having a net positive impact on the number of overflights.

Traffic to and from Russia and Ukraine is missing, on the other hand, reroutings to and from North Europe, and the Far East (and other parts of Asia), as well as new routes between Russia and non-EU states have brought a significant amount of additional traffic. The size of this impact has further increased towards the year-end, as the traffic between Europe and Asia started to gain momentum.

The Hungarian ANSP experienced a very strong recovery (with overflights already passing the 2019-level (by 20% on some days) in 2022), and this was only in part a consequence of the reroutings, there was also a very strong increase of the organic traffic on the South-East axis. Especially in the summer, when leisure traffic from Western Europe to Greece and Türkiye created an unexpected high demand on our flow.

In addition to the already high demand, ANS provision was impacted by the war in one more way: there were military airspaces to decrease capacity and to increase complexity in the Hungarian airspace.

Reaction time: there is very little the Hungarian ANSP could have done to react to the explosion of traffic demand in the short run (i.e. through the course of 2022). ATCO training was postponed under COVID (as an adaptation to the traffic decrease) and although already resumed, cannot be accelerated on short notice.

The originally planned number of ATCOs was not (and will not be) enough to manage the traffic without disruptions (regulations, delays and re-routings of the re-routings).

The war has caused a significant increase in traffic in Budapest ACC, resulting in traffic reaching pre-COVID 2019 levels already in 2022. Budapest ACC was able to manage the unexpected traffic growth with ca. 60% fewer delays than in 2019, which was though not enough to meet the target, but allowed air traffic on the Eastern border of the Network to operate without any particular problems.

Our view is that had the war not broken out, Budapest ACC would have been able to handle the 2022 traffic within its capacity target.

We believe that a very significant part of the excess delay was due to the war. We have flagged this issue to the PRB and EC and also to the Network Management Board already, and although we understand that in 317/2019 the definition of “exceptional event” does not by word apply to our situation, we still believe that by the legislative intent a regular war in the neighbouring country, causing significant disruptions does qualify as an “exceptional event”.

Monitoring process for capacity performance

The war has caused a significant increase in traffic in Budapest ACC, resulting in traffic reaching pre-COVID 2019 levels already in 2022.

Budapest ACC was able to manage the unexpected traffic growth with ca 60% fewer delays than in 2019, which was though not enough to meet the target, but allowed air traffic on the Eastern border of the Network to operate without any particular problems.

Capacity planning

Capacity planning with NM for the year 2022 was completed in January with the conclusion that there will be no capacity issue.

Unfortunately at the end of February Russians started a war against Ukraine, and due to the closure of the Ukrainian airspace, all flights which have used that airspace for overflight before were forced to reroute via our airspace.

Unfortunately, the capacity planning process did not follow this huge rerouting and we were able to introduce only a few measures for summer in order to manage the extremely increased demand.

Application of Corrective Measures for Capacity (if applicable)

The war has caused a significant increase in traffic in Budapest ACC, resulting in traffic reaching pre-COVID 2019 levels already in 2022. This was unexpected and the measures which were introduced during the first part of the year could only mitigate the capacity shortage.

Since there is no sign that the war in Ukraine will be over in 2023 and thus the traffic demand in Budapest ACC will remain very high, further adjustments are needed on terms of sector capacities and in the availability of ATCOs, through fine-tuning of the ATCO rostering.

Other indicators

Focus on ATCOs in operations

N/A

Terminal performance

Arrival ATFM delay (KPI#2)

Focus on arrival ATFM delay

Hungary identified only its main airport Budapest as subject to RP3 monitoring. The Airport Operator Data Flow is correctly established and all capacity indicators can be monitored. Traffic at Budapest airport in 2022 was still by 20% lower compared to 2019 regardless the increase of 80% with respect to 2021.

Like in 2021, no arrival ATFM delays were observed in the entire 2022 at Budapest while ATFM slot adherence has slightly deteriorated (2022: 95.4%; 2021: 96.0%).

No arrival ATFM delays were recorded in the entire 2022 at Budapest (LHBP: 2019: 0.03 min/arr.; 2020: 0.08 min/arr.; 2021: 0 min/arr.; 2022: 0 min/arr.)
Regarding the Russian war, the Hungarian monitoring report mentions that since all cancelled flights to/and from Russia and Ukraine represented less than 10% of LHBP traffic, and that there were no war related delays at LHBP in 2022.

The national target on arrival ATFM delay in 2022 was met.

Other terminal performance indicators (PI#1-3)

Airport level
Airport name
Avg arrival ATFM delay (KPI#2)
Slot adherence (PI#1)
ATC pre departure delay (PI#2)
All causes pre departure delay (PI#3)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Budapest 0.08 0.00 NA NA NA 96.2% 96.0% 95.4% NA% NA% 0.14 0.14 0.10 NA NA 12.6 15.6 21.1 NA NA
Focus on performance indicators at airport level

ATFM slot adherence

Budapest’s ATFM slot compliance was 95.4%, very similar to the performance in 2021 (96%). With regard to the 4.6% of flights that did not adhere, 1.5% was early and 3.1% was late.

ATC pre-departure delay

The performance in terms of ATC pre-departure delay at Budapest has further improved with respect to the previous years (LHBP; 2019: 0.30 min/dep.; 2020: 0.16 min/dep.; 2021: 0.14 min/dep.; 2022: 0.10 min/dep.).

All causes pre-departure delay

The total (all causes) delay in the actual off block time at Budapest significantly increased in 2022 (LHBP: 2020: 12.58 min/dep.; 2021: 15.61 min/dep.; 2022: 21.12 min/dep.). The highest delays per flight were observed in June and July averaging more than 30 min/dep.

According to the Hungarian monitoring report: The actual performance in this respect was a bit worse than in the previous years, which could be explained with the overall staffing issues at the LHBP. After COVID-19 pandemic similar staffing problems were experienced at many airport in Europe.

 
  • © European Union, 2025

  • Disclaimer

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission