• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • About
  • Download
  • Publications
  1. Capacity
  • Year report
    • 2023
    • 2022 ✓
    • 2021
    • 2020

  • Czech Republic
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Occurrences

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Capacity - Czech Republic

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Czech Republic registered 1.50 minutes of average en route ATFM delay per flight during 2022 which has been adjusted to 1.45 during the post-ops adjustment process.

▪ Average en route ATFM delay per flight was further adjusted to 1.33 minutes per flight due to the exceptional event related to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, still not achieving the local target value of 0.11. The discussion between the PRB and the Czech NSA regarding the adjustments due to the exceptional event related to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine is still ongoing at the time of the publication of this report.

▪ The average number of IFR movements was 29% below 2019 levels in Czech Republic in 2022.

▪ The number of ATCOs in OPS is planned to increase by 38% in Prague ACC by the end of RP3. The actual values remained 5% below the planned level in 2022, which is mainly caused by decelerated training due to the COVID impact.

▪ The system implementation at Prague ACC during 2022 combined with the impact of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine had a detrimental effect on capacity performance in Czech Republic.

▪ Delays were highest between June and October, mostly driven by other reasons (system implementation).

▪ The share of delayed flights with delays longer than 15 minutes in the Czech Republic increased by 19.41 p.p. compared to 2021 and was higher than 2019 values.

▪ The yearly total of sector opening hours in Prague ACC was 41,001 in 2022, showing a 58.7% increase compared to 2021. Sector opening hours are 12.5% below 2019 levels.

▪ Prague ACC registered 12.99 IFR movements per one sector opening hour in 2022, being 26.9% below 2019 levels.

En route performance

En route ATFM delay (KPI#1)

Focus on en route ATFM delay

Summary of capacity performance

The Czech Republic experienced an increase in traffic from 404k flights in 2021 to 616k flights in 2022, with 892k minutes of en route ATFM delay. Traffic levels were still below the 867k flights in 2019.

26k minutes of en route ATFM delay originating in the Praha ACC were re-attributed to DFS (13k) and DSNA (13k) via the NM post operations delay attribution process, according to the NMB agreement for eNM/S22 measures, to ameliorate capacity shortfalls in both Karlsruhe UAC and Reims ACC.

An additional 68k minutes of ATFM delay due to ‘exceptional events’ were excluded after consultation with the European Commission and the Network Manager, giving a final value of 730k minutes of en route ATFM delay.

NSA’s assessment of capacity performance

The whole year 2022 was very unusual in terms of operational context. Civil aviation entered the year with expectations of the fading effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and an expected return of traffic volumes to the pre-crisis levels.

These expectations were matched by the newly approved revised performance plan, which focused on capacity growth and further streamlining of all processes to ensure that all users of the Czech airspace were provided with sufficient service capacity and that all commitments made in the performance plan in areas of the CAP and ENV were met.

From this perspective, the continuation of the cross-border integration of FRA and in particular the deployment of the new main ATM system, i.e. the TopSky project, were essential.

While the last impacts and constraints related to the covid-19 pandemic have almost become a thing of the past, we have had to deal with another obstacle that is almost unthinkable in the civilised world. Russia’s aggression against Ukraine has not only damaged the confidence of a large part of society in a stable security arrangement in Europe, but has fundamentally affected the expected return to normalcy of civil air traffic.

This led to fundamental changes in the layout and structure of air traffic flow, which have had a negative impact on the Czech airspace. In particular, increased special MIL OPS forced AOs and ANSPs to search for alternative OPS. In order to ensure special MIL OPS, dedicated corridors of temporary segregated airspace through the entire LKAA were designed and ad-hoc activated.

For this reason, frequent changes of horizontal and vertical profiles had to be used on tactical level in order to combine the requirements of CIV and MIL users as much as possible.

As a consequence, and in combination with newly implemented ATM system Top Sky, it had despite the immediate implementation of corrective measures (in particular increased use of available ATCOs) negative impact on both capacity and enviromental performance of the ANS CR.

There was a significant lack of capacity in LKAA in 2022 due to a time-limited combination of unfavourable factors.

Firstly, ANS CR puts into OPS the new ATM system Top Sky on 24 FEB 2022.

Secondly, the Russian’s war of aggression against Ukraine had very negative impact on OPS in LKAA. Remedial actions were taken already in 2022 (since August 2022, the recorded delay has been on a downward trend) and also they have been taken to significantly improve the situation in 2023.

Monitoring process for capacity performance

The monitoring process is based on quarterly monitoring reports prepared by ANS CR. These are based on the company Annual plan and cover all KPAs.

In accordance with the NM, 26k minutes of delay were deducted from LKAA FIR and allocated to DFS and DSNA within the framework of PostOPS Adjustment.

In coordination with NM, ANS CR assigned all ATFM measures in relation to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and new ATMS system Top Sky implementation with designation “special event”. In total it represents 766k minutes.

Capacity planning

No data available

Application of Corrective Measures for Capacity (if applicable)

The reason for the lack of capacity in the Czech Republic airspace was a combination of unfavourable factors. ANS CR decided to stick to the plan and switch OPS to the new ATM system Tops Sky regardless Russia started its aggression against Ukraine on the same moment.

Full utilisation of operational staff with maximum use of overtime (up to the legal limit), ongoing airspace optimisation project (cross licencing and training of ATCO students on layer ‘’L’’).

Coordination with the Czech AirForce regarding minimization of MIL OPS impacts on civil aviation, stabilization and repairs of TopSky in cooperation with the supplier (THALES ).

Additional Information Related to Russia’s War of Aggression Against Ukraine

Russian invasion of Ukraine have major impact on OPS in LKAA. As can be seen from the statistics, it caused significant changes in traffic flows. In addition, increased and special MIL OPS forced AOs ans ANSPs to search for alternative OPS.

In order to ensure special MIL OPS dedicated corridors of temporary segregated airspace through the entire LKAA were designed and ad-hoc activated. For this reason, frequent changes of horizontal and vertical profiles had to be used on tactical level in order to combine the requirements of CIV and MIL users as much as possible.

As a consequence, and in combination with newly implemented ATM system Top Sky, it had negative impact on ANS CR capacity performance.

In coordination with NM ANS CR assigned all ATFM measures in relation to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and new ATMS system Top Sky implementation with designation “special event”. In total it represents 766k minutes.

FEB - 1367, MAR - 1271, APR - 53783, MAY - 28625, JUN - 239520, JUL - 278549, AUG - 88395, SEP - 52731, OCT - 20225, NOV - 395, DEC - 1196

Remedial actions to mitigate the adverse impacts on capacity performance include: full utilisation of operational staff with maximum use of overtime (up to the legal limit), ongoing airspace optimisation project, close cooperation with the NM.

Other indicators

Focus on ATCOs in operations

ANS CR continues its Optimisation project to increase its performance through airspace changes and increased number of ATCOs.

The number of operational ATCOs is some 5 % below the expected level, this deviation is non-material and is caused mainly by decelerated training due to the COVID impact.

Terminal performance

Arrival ATFM delay (KPI#2)

Focus on arrival ATFM delay

Czech Republic has included only Prague in their last Performance Plan for RP3 monitoring.
The Airport Operator Data Flow, necessary for the monitoring of the additional times, is correctly established at Prague and the monitoring of all environment indicators can be performed.
Traffic this airport in 2022 was still 36% lower than in 2019, even if 70% higher than in 2021.

Average arrival ATFM delays in 2022 was 0.13 min/arr, compared to 0.01 min/arr in 2021.
ATFM slot adherence has improved (2022: 96.1%; 2021: 95.3%).

Delays at Prague (LKPR: 2019: 0.18 min/arr.; 2020: 0.09 min/arr.; 2021: 0.01 min/arr.; 2022: 0.13 min/arr.)remained very low in 2022 despite an increase by 0.12 min/arr. 59% of the delays were attributed to weather, followed by 28% attributed to special events.

According to the Czech monitoring report: Russia’s aggression against Ukraine has major impact on LKPR OPS. Because of ban on flights to/from Russia and Belarus and no flight zone in Ukraine LKPR suffers from significant traffic reduction.
3. Arrival ATFM Delay – National TargetThe national target on arrival ATFM delay in 2022 was met.

The slot adherence in 2022 was 96.1%, a slight improvement with respect to 2021 (95.3%). With regard to the 3.9% of flights that did not adhere, 2.1% was early and 1.7% was late.
According to the Czech monitoring report: The ATFM slot adherence was within the required range and was even better than in the previous year. In order to keep these levels, ANS CR monitors the value on a monthly basis and continuously educates ATCOs.

Other terminal performance indicators (PI#1-3)

Airport level
Airport name
Avg arrival ATFM delay (KPI#2)
Slot adherence (PI#1)
ATC pre departure delay (PI#2)
All causes pre departure delay (PI#3)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2020 2021 2022 2023 2020 2021 2022 2023 2020 2021 2022 2023
Brno Turany NA NA NA NA 100.0% 98.2% 99.2% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Karlovy Vary NA NA NA NA 100.0% 100.0% 97.3% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Ostrava NA NA NA NA 100.0% 98.0% 99.4% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Prague/Ruzyne 0.09 0.01 0.13 NA 94.7% 95.3% 96.1% NA% 0.22 NA 0.04 NA 8.3 8.3 17.9 NA
Focus on performance indicators at airport level

ATFM slot adherence

The quality of the airport data reported by Prague (the only Czech airport subject to monitoring of this indicator) is too low, preventing the calculation of this indicator.

The calculation of the ATC pre-departure delay is based on the data provided by the airport operators through the Airport Operator Data Flow (APDF) which is properly implemented at Prague.
However, there are several quality checks before EUROCONTROL can produce the final value which is established as the average minutes of pre-departure delay (delay in the actual off block time) associated to the IATA delay code 89 (through the APDF, for each delayed flight, the reasons for that delay have to be transmitted and coded according to IATA delay codes.
However, sometimes the airport operator has no information concerning the reasons for the delay in the off block, or they cannot convert the reasons to the IATA delay codes. In those cases, the airport operator might:
- Not report any information about the reasons for the delay for that flight (unreported delay)
- Report a special code to indicate they do not have the information (code ZZZ)
- Report a special code to indicate they do not have the means to collect and/or translate the information (code 999)
To be able to calculate with a minimum of accuracy the PI for a given month, the minutes of delay that are not attributed to any IATA code reason should not exceed 40% of the total minutes of pre-departure delay observed at the airport.
Finally, to be able to produce the annual figure, at least 10 months of valid data is requested by EUROCONTROL.

The share of unidentified delay reported by Prague was above 40% for 10 months in 2022, preventing the calculation of this indicator.

ATC pre-departure delay

Prague is the only Czech airport subject to the monitoring of this indicator.
The total (all causes) delay in the actual off block time at Prague in 2022 increased significantly compared to 2021 (LKPR: 2020: 8.30 min/dep.; 2021: 8.32 min/dep.; 2022: 17.92 min/dep.). The highest delays per flight were observed in Summer.

According to the Czech monitoring report: Based on the data received from LKPR, the structure and a portion of the delays are as follows: ATC & En-route delay: 19,63 %; LKPR airport facilities: 0,48 %; Weather: 4,14 %; Other airport facilities: 3,34 %; Airline operators: 13,53 %; Security & Immigration: 1,98 %; Other reasons: 56,87 %.
The part of the delay due to ATC & En-route reasons (19,63 %) is due to the limitations caused by the lack of capacity of ANSPs and in case of ANS CR the impact of War in Ukraine and implementation of new system TopSky.

All causes pre-departure delay

No data available: airport operator data flow not established, or more than two months of missing / non-validated data

 
  • © European Union, 2024

  • Disclaimer

  • [email protected]

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission