• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • Investments
    • SES RP3

    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • About
  • Download
  • Data Portal
  • Publications
  1. Capacity
  • Year report
    • RP3
    • 2024
    • 2023 ✓
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020

  • Latvia
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Safety occurrences
      • Runway incursions
      • Separation minima infringements
      • Occurrences reporting
    • ASDRS

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Capacity - Latvia

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Latvia registered zero minutes of average en route ATFM delay per flight during 2023, thus achieving the local target value of 0.03. Delays in Latvia remained unchanged year-on-year.

▪ The average number of IFR movements was 33% below 2019 levels in Latvia in 2023.

▪ The number of ATCOs in OPS is expected to increase by 9% by 2024, with the actual value being below the 2023 plan in Riga by 13 FTEs.

▪ The yearly total of sector opening hours in Riga ACC was 24,050, showing a 0.8% increase compared to 2022. Sector opening hours are 16.6% below 2019 levels.

▪ Riga ACC registered 8.25 IFR movements per one sector opening hour in 2023, being 19.7% below 2019 levels.

▪ Latvia registered an average airport arrival ATFM delay of 0.00 minutes per flight in 2023, achieving the local target of 0.02 minutes.

▪ Compared to 2022, the number of IFR arrivals in Latvia increased by 10.65%.

En route performance

En route ATFM delay (KPI#1)

Focus on en route ATFM delay

Summary of capacity performance

Latvia experienced an increase in traffic, from 186k flights in 2022 with zero delay, to 196k flights in 2023, also with zero ATFM delays. Traffic levels are still much lower than the 2019 levels of 295k flights.

NSA’s assessment of capacity performance

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine, which began in 2022, continued to exert substantial influence on air traffic patterns and volumes in 2023. The sanctions imposed by the European Union (EU) against Russia, along with reciprocal sanctions by Russia, led to a dramatic shift in traffic flows. Specifically, flights between Europe and Russia remained suspended, and routes to and from China and Southeast Asia were significantly reduced. Sanctions forced Russian operators to navigate around EU airspace, leading to increased traffic over international waters in the Baltic Sea to connect Kaliningrad with mainland Russia. Being a NATO state, which directly borders Russian Federation, the complexity of airspace has gone up. More military zones are being set up.

There were no capacity problems in Riga FIR and no capacity problems in an any of the aerodromes in 2023.

Monitoring process for capacity performance

Monitoring through annual inspections and safety meetings with the ANSP.

Capacity planning

Capacity planning is appropriate for the required performance. No ATFM delays were observed.

Application of Corrective Measures for Capacity (if applicable)

Due to staff shortage under specific circumstances there is a possibility that capacity could be impacted. Results of the ATCO fatigue risk and stress assessment revealed the necessary changes that must implemented by the ANSP - mainly- to ensure sufficient ATCO staffing numbers (increase of ATCOs), and to ensure appropriate rostering system implementation beyond excell sheet in order to comply with EU reg 2017/373 requirements for Fatigue Risk and Stress Management (FRSM).

The NSA intends to monitor the situation, to ensure proper application of the EU Reg 2017/373 requirements for FRMS.

Additional Information Related to Russia’s War of Aggression Against Ukraine

The changes of traffic flows in Riga FIR were material. EU and RU banned one another’s airspace users on entering the airspace. That lead to decline in flights to East Asia. Basically the Europe - Russian flight segment (a quarter of all flights prior to crisis) was fully wiped out. On the other hand Riga FIR now handles all the traffic to Kaliningrad exclave. This negatively impacts Environment Key Performance indicator. Latvia gained some extra traffic on north - south axis due to previously mentioned bans on use of airspaces. Bordering Russia and being both EU and NATO member state, Latvia experiences more traffic complexity due to more military restriction zones. All of the above does not directly effect the capacity performance expressed as ATFM delay KPI, however it adds complexity, volatility and uncertainty, especially financially (inability to pay by RU operators, volatility of traffic and decrease of average SU per flight).

To mitigate any possible impacts on en route capacity performance, due to higher than expected decline in number of ATCOs, ANSP is now training new ATCOs to replenish their amount to normal operational level of 62 ATCOs.

En route Capacity Incentive Scheme

LGS: The incentive scheme is under review by the European Commission.
In accordance with Article 3(3)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627: The incentive scheme shall cover only the calendar years 2022 to 2024.

Other indicators

Focus on ATCOs in operations

The war in Ukraine had a material and adverse effect on the traffic flows. Those changes triggered the change of the assumptions in the Performance plan, which was adopted on December 5, 2022. The main assumption of the ATCO planning was that the operational capacity of 62 ATCOs is sufficient to cope with the traffic. Some ATCOs retired due to medical reasons and few left for other ANSPs in Europe, mainly due to financial reasons. There is a plan to replenish the ATCOs levels during the RP4, starting from 2024. The lower level of ATCOs is still sufficient to cope with lower level of traffic, however some non-ATCO duties are abolished in order to complete the operational roster.

Terminal performance

Arrival ATFM delay (KPI#2)

Focus on arrival ATFM delay

Latvia identified 4 airports as subject to RP3 monitoring. In accordance with IR (EU) 2019/317 and the traffic figures at these 4 airports, pre-departure delays are not monitored and the capacity performance monitoring focuses on arrival ATFM delay and slot adherence. Traffic at these Latvian airports in 2023 was still 30% lower than in 2019, regardless of a 11% increase with respect to 2022.

No arrival ATFM delays were recorded at Latvian airports in 2023, same as in 2022. National target was met.ATFM slot adherence remained very high at 99.5% in 2023 (2022: 99.6%).

Average arrival ATFM delays in 2023 were zero at all three Latvian airports. The Latvian monitoring report clarifies: EVVA has no ATS. EVRA and EVLA has no capacity issues. CDM has been voluntarily implemented by Riga airport and LGS to ensure a back up support, for expedient air traffic movement ir Riga airport.

The Latvian performance plan sets a national target on arrival ATFM delay for 2023 of 0.02 min/arr. This target was met with an actual performance of 0.00 min/arr. According to the Performance Plan, this should correspond to a maximum bonus of 2%, however the Latvian monitoring report does not declare any bonus.

Other terminal performance indicators (PI#1-3)

Airport level
Airport name
Avg arrival ATFM delay (KPI#2)
Slot adherence (PI#1)
ATC pre departure delay (PI#2)
All causes pre departure delay (PI#3)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020
Liepaya NA NA NA NA NA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% NA% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Riga 0.02 0.00 NA NA NA 98.8% 99.6% 99.5% NA% 98.4% 0.03 0.02 0.03 NA NA 6.8 13.7 12.8 NA 4.6
Focus on performance indicators at airport level

ATFM slot adherence

Riga’s ATFM slot compliance was an excellent 99.5%. With regard to the 0.5% of flights that did not adhere, 0.4% was early and 0.1% was late. EVVA did not have any regulated departures and EVLA had only 1, with a 100% slot adherence.

According to the Latvian monitoring report: Overall, the performance has remained the same at 99% adherence to the ATFM slots in Riga airport and 100% at Liepaja. EVVA (Ventstpils) has no ATS and EVLA (Liepaja) has only AFIS with limited working hours.

ATC pre-departure delay

This indicator is not monitored for airports below 80 000 IFR movements annual average during the 2016-2018 period, so it is not monitored for any airport in Latvia.

All causes pre-departure delay

This indicator is not monitored for airports below 80 000 IFR movements annual average during the 2016-2018 period, so it is not monitored for any airport in Latvia.

 
  • © European Union, 2025

  • Disclaimer

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission