• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • About
  • Download
  • Publications
  1. Cost-efficiency
  • Year report
    • 2023 ✓
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020

  • Latvia
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Occurrences

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Cost-efficiency - Latvia

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ The en route 2023 actual unit cost of Latvia was 38.45 €2017, +8.0% higher than the determined unit cost (35.62 €2017). The terminal 2023 actual unit cost was 152.45 €2017, +16% higher than the determined unit cost (131.92 €2017).

▪ The en route 2023 actual service units (0.47M) were -15% lower than the determined service units (0.55M), mainly due to shifted traffic flows caused by the Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.

▪ The en route 2023 actual total costs were -1.6 M€2017 (-8.2%) lower than determined. The reduction in total cost was due to the lower staff costs (-1.3 M€2017, or -12%) which was a result of a reduction in staff numbers driven by lower than anticipated traffic volumes. In addition, other operating costs were lower than planned (-0.6 M€2017 or -13%), largely attributable to the MET provider LVĢMC, stemming from the cancellation and deferral of planned acquisitions.

▪ The ANSPs spent 6.7 M€2017 in 2023 related to costs of investments for both en route and terminal charging zones, -2.4% less than determined (6.9 M€2017). Although there was a difference in depreciation costs (+0.1 M€2017 or +2.2%) due to the commissioning of several assets that had been delayed since 2020, the cost of capital showed a gap (-0.3 M€2017 or -15%) primarily due to a significant reduction in net current assets (-2.1 M€2017 or -85%). However, the NSA did not provide a detailed explanation for this substantial reduction in net current assets.

▪ The en route actual unit cost incurred by users in 2023 was 50.65€ (+22% above the 2023 DUC), while the terminal actual unit cost incurred by users was 156.13€ (+4.6% above the 2023 DUC). The difference between the AUCU and the DUC for en route charging zone is strongly affected by the difference between the determined and actual SUs.

▪ The en route regulatory result for LGS amounted to +2.3 M€, or 11% of the 2023 revenue. This may indicate that the airspace users are charged for costs which have not materialised in 2023. The PRB will take into consideration the implementation of the RP3 performance plan when assessing the RP4 cost-efficiency targets.

En route charging zone

Unit cost (KPI#1)

Actual and determined data
Total costs - nominal (M€) 2020-2021 2022 2023 2024
Actual costs 38 20 22 NA
Determined costs 40 20 23 23
Difference costs −2 0 0 NA
Inflation assumptions 2020-2021 2022 2023 2024
Determined inflation rate NA 10.0% 3.9% 3.1%
Determined inflation index NA 119.7 124.3 128.1
Actual inflation rate NA 17.2% 9.1% NA
Actual inflation index NA 127.5 139.2 NA
Difference inflation index (p.p.) NA +7.8 +14.8 NA
Focus on unit cost

AUC vs. DUC

In 2023, the en route AUC was +8.0% (or +2.83 €2017) higher than the planned DUC. This results from the combination of significantly lower than planned TSUs (-15.0%) and significantly lower than planned en route costs in real terms (-8.2%, or -1.6 M€2017). It should be noted that actual inflation index in 2023 was +14.8 p.p. higher than planned.

En route service units

The difference between actual and planned TSUs (-15.0%) falls outside the ±10% threshold foreseen in the traffic risk sharing mechanism. The resulting loss of en route revenues is therefore shared between the ANSP and the airspace users .

En route costs by entity

Actual real en route costs are -8.2% (-1.6 M€2017) lower than planned. This is the result of lower costs for the main ANSP, LGS (-8.1%, or -1.4 M€2017), the MET service provider (-32.7%, or -0.1 M€2017) and the NSA/EUROCONTROL (-4.2%, or -0.1 M€2017).

En route costs for the main ANSP at charging zone level

Significantly lower than planned en route costs in real terms for LGS in 2023 (-8.1%, or -1.4 M€2017) result from:
- Significantly lower staff costs (-14.0%), reflecting reduction in staff numbers due to lower than planned traffic volumes.
- Significantly lower other operating costs (-10.3%) in real terms, reflecting primarily the impact of the inflation index (+14.8 p.p.) since, in nominal terms, other operating costs are mostly in line with the plan (+0.4%).
- Significantly higher depreciation (+13.8%), reflecting the “commissioning of initially (2020-2021) delayed investments in 2023”.
- Significantly lower cost of capital (-8.9%), which, since LGS is entirely financed through equity, reflects lower actual asset base used to calculate the cost of capital.
- Higher deduction for VFR exempted flights (+21.9%).

Actual unit cost incurred by the users (AUCU) (PI#1)

AUCU components (€/SU) – 2023
Components of the AUCU in 2023 €/SU
DUC 41.44
Inflation adjustment 4.17
Cost exempt from cost-sharing −0.13
Traffic risk sharing adjustment 4.33
Traffic adj. (costs not TRS) 1.18
Finantial incentives 0.00
Modulation of charges 0.00
Cross-financing 0.00
Other revenues −0.33
Application of lower unit rate 0.00
Total adjustments 9.22
AUCU 50.65
AUCU vs. DUC +22.2%
Cost exempt from cost sharing by item - 2023 €'000 €/SU
New and existing investments 95.6 0.21
Competent authorities and qualified entities costs −11.9 −0.03
Eurocontrol costs −80.8 −0.17
Pension costs −63.5 −0.14
Interest on loans 0.0 0.00
Changes in law 0.0 0.00
Total cost exempt from cost risk sharing −60.6 −0.13
Focus on AUCU

The actual en route unit cost incurred by airspace users (AUCU) in respect of activities performed in 2023 (50.65 €) is +22.2% higher than the nominal DUC (41.44 €). The difference between these two figures (+9.22 €/SU) is due to:
- the positive inflation adjustment resulting from higher than planned inflation (+4.17 €/SU);
- the impact of adjustments resulting from the costs exempted from cost-sharing mechanism (-0.13 €/SU);
- the addition of the traffic risk sharing adjustments (+4.33 €/SU);
- the addition of the traffic adjustment (+1.18 €/SU) for the costs not subject to traffic risk sharing; and
- the deduction of the other revenues (-0.33 €/SU).
The share of the regulatory result in the AUCU (before the deduction of other revenues) is 10.3%.

Regulatory result (RR)

Focus on regulatory result

LGS net gain on activity in the Latvia en route charging zone in the year 2023

LGS reported a net gain of +1.2 M€, as a combination of a gain of +2.1 M€ arising from the cost sharing mechanism, with a loss of -0.8 M€ arising from the traffic risk sharing mechanism.

LGS overall regulatory results (RR) for the en route activity

Ex-post, the overall RR taking into account the net gain from the en route activity mentioned above (+1.2 M€) and the actual RoE (+1.0 M€) amounts to +2.3 M€ (10.7% of the en route revenues). The resulting ex-post rate of return on equity is 10.9%, which is higher than the 5.0% planned in the PP.

 
  • © European Union, 2024

  • Disclaimer

  • [email protected]

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission