• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • Investments
    • SES RP3

    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • About
  • Download
  • Data Portal
  • Publications
  1. Capacity
  • Year report
    • RP3
    • 2024 ✓
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020

  • Czech Republic
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Safety occurrences
      • Runway incursions
      • Separation minima infringements
      • Occurrences reporting
    • ASDRS

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Capacity - Czech Republic

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ Czech Republic registered 0.14 minutes of average en route ATFM delay per flight during 2024, which has been adjusted to 0.13 during the post-ops adjustment process, thus not achieving the local target value of 0.11. Delays in Czech Republic increased by 0.04 minutes per flight year-on-year.

▪ Delays were highest between June and August, mainly driven by adverse weather conditions and ATC capacity issues.

▪ The share of delayed flights with delays longer than 15 minutes in the Czech Republic increased by 3 percentage points compared to 2023 and was higher than 2019 values.

▪ The average number of IFR movements was 16% below 2019 levels in the Czech Republic in 2024.

▪ The number of ATCOs in OPS is 144, being below the 2024 plan in Prague by 16 FTEs.

▪ The yearly total of sector opening hours in Prague ACC was 45,209, showing a 6.6% increase compared to 2023. Sector opening hours are 3.6% below 2019 levels.

▪ Prague ACC registered 15.71 IFR movements per one sector opening hour in 2024, being 11.6% below 2019 levels.

En route performance

En route ATFM delay (KPI#1)

Focus on en route ATFM delay

Summary of capacity performance

The Czech Republic experienced an increase in traffic from 703k flights in 2023, to 784k flights in 2024. En route ATFM delays increased from 56k minutes of delay in 2023 to 90k minutes in 2024. Traffic levels and ATFM delays are still significantly below 2019 levels (867k flights and 184k minutes of delay). There were an additional 11k minutes of delay originating in the Czech Republic that were re-attributed to DFS via the NM post operations delay attribution process, according to the NMB agreement for eNM/S24 measures, to ameliorate capacity shortfalls in Karlsruhe UAC.

NSA’s assessment of capacity performance

The targets set in the capacity KPA were almost met. In the en route area, the Czech Republic shows a minor deviation of 0.02 min/IFR flight, while in the case of terminal services both the delay target and compliance with departure slots were met. ANS CR was convinced that the objectives of this area are being met, however, the annual monitoring identified a difference between the internal methodology and the reality (according to NM) in the allocation between the en route and terminal area. This situation did not allow for corrective measures to be taken.

Monitoring process for capacity performance

The monitoring process is based on quarterly monitoring reports prepared by ANS CR. These are based on the company Annual plan and cover all KPAs.

Capacity planning

After the deployment of the new main ATM system (2022) and its stabilisation in previous periods, thanks to the continued training of new ATCOs and the gradual implementation of the Airspace Optimisation project in the Czech Republic (as outlined in the Czech Performance Plan for RP3), the Czech Republic has built sufficient capacity to adhere to the required level of performance.

Unfortunatelly, the NM uses a different methodology for recording network delay, where TVs (trafic volumes) of the “Enroute” category (which includes TMA Praha) are included in the line delay. At the same time, NM has transferred part of the en route delay of ANS CR to DFS within the post-processing procedure “delay reattribution”. The resulting value of ACC Praha’s en route delay according to the NM methodology is 0.13 min/year. Thus, the capacity target of 0.02 min/year is not met from the point of view of performance planning.

Application of Corrective Measures for Capacity (if applicable)

Part of the delay is caused by neighbouring FIRs and we don’t know how much will be deducted in post-ops adjustments. Different methodology between ANS CR and NM, which allocates part of the airport delay to the en route segment. The hard-to-estimate impact of military activities.

The differential delay allocation methodology has already been resolved, the ongoing training of ATCOs and the ongoing Optimisation give the expectation of meeting the target in future years. NSA also recommends adjustments to training to accelerate the pace of operational personnel additions.

Actions already taken during RP3 to improve performance included:
- Staff Usage - full utilisation of operational staff with maximum use of overtime (up to legal limit);
- Optimisation project - Cross licensing and training of ATCO students on layer ‘L’;
- External factors - Coordination with the Czech AirForce in order to limit the ipact of their activities on civil aviation.

All remedial measures from previous years have been / are being implemented. If the traffic is consistent with the Performance plan assumption, there is sufficient capacity meet the capacity objective.

En route Capacity Incentive Scheme

ANS CR: The NSA reports that, ANS CR is liable for a financial penalty of CZK 4 188 815.14
In accordance with Article 3(3)(a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627: The incentive scheme shall cover only the calendar years 2022 to 2024.

Other indicators

Focus on ATCOs in operations

The number of operational ATCOs is some 10 % (in terms of FTE) below the planned level. This difference is due to 2 reasons: there are 34% less trained ATCOs than planned (in terms of FTE), the reason is the slowdown of training during the COVID19 pandemic when there was not enough traffic. The second reason is the 36% higher number of ATCOs (in terms of FTE) who have stopped working. Intensive training of additional ATCOs is curently underway to close this gap.

Terminal performance

Arrival ATFM delay (KPI#2)

Focus on arrival ATFM delay

Czech Republic has included only Prague in their last Performance Plan for RP3 monitoring. The Airport Operator Data Flow, necessary for the monitoring of the additional times, is correctly established at Prague and the monitoring of all environment indicators can be performed. Traffic this airport in 2024 was still 14% lower than in 2019, but 15% higher than in 2023.

Average arrival ATFM delays in 2024 was 0.15 min/arr, compared to 0.07 min/arr in 2023. The target was met. ATFM slot adherence has improved (2023: 97%; 2024: 97.2%).

Delays at Prague (LKPR: 2019: 0.18 min/arr.; 2020: 0.09 min/arr.; 2021: 0.01 min/arr.; 2022: 0.13 min/arr.; 2023: 0.07 min/arr.; 2024: 0.15 min/arr.) increased in 2024. 95% of the delays were attributed to Weather and 4% attributed to Aerodrome Capacity.

According to the Czech monitoring report: Achievement of the objective is mainly dependent on the weather and ongoing construction work at the airport. In combination with the low traffic, the target was met. Russia’s aggression against Ukraine has major impact on LKPR OPS. Because of ban on flights to/from Russia and Belarus and no flight zone in Ukraine LKPR suffers from significant traffic reduction.

The Czech performance plan sets a national target on arrival ATFM delay for all RP3 of 0.4 min/arr. This target was met in 2024 with an actual performance of 0.15 min/arr. According to the Czech monitoring report, this performance corresponds to the maximum bonus (0.50%), computed by the NSA as CZK2963110.

Other terminal performance indicators (PI#1-3)

Airport level
Airport name
Avg arrival ATFM delay (KPI#2)
Slot adherence (PI#1)
ATC pre departure delay (PI#2)
All causes pre departure delay (PI#3)
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Brno Turany NA NA NA NA NA 100.0% 98.2% 99.2% 99.6% 99.3% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Karlovy Vary NA NA NA NA NA 100.0% 100.0% 97.3% 98.3% 98.2% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Ostrava NA NA NA NA NA 100.0% 98.0% 99.4% 98.9% 99.4% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Prague/Ruzyne 0.09 0.01 0.13 0.07 0.15 94.7% 95.3% 96.1% 97.0% 97.2% 0.22 NA 0.04 NA 0.08 8.3 8.3 17.9 16.1 18.5
Focus on performance indicators at airport level

ATFM slot adherence

The slot adherence in 2024 was 97.2%, a slight improvement with respect to 2023 (97%). With regard to the 2.77% of flights that did not adhere, 0.92% were early and 1.85% were late.

ATC pre-departure delay

The quality of the airport data reported by Prague (the only Czech airport subject to monitoring of this indicator) is too low, preventing the calculation of this indicator.

The calculation of the ATC pre-departure delay is based on the data provided by the airport operators through the Airport Operator Data Flow (APDF) which is properly implemented at Prague. However, there are several quality checks before EUROCONTROL can produce the final value which is established as the average minutes of pre-departure delay (delay in the actual off block time) associated to the IATA delay code 89 (through the APDF, for each delayed flight, the reasons for that delay have to be transmitted and coded according to IATA delay codes.

However, sometimes the airport operator has no information concerning the reasons for the delay in the off block, or they cannot convert the reasons to the IATA delay codes. In those cases, the airport operator might:
- Not report any information about the reasons for the delay for that flight (unreported delay)
- Report a special code to indicate they do not have the information (code ZZZ)
- Report a special code to indicate they do not have the means to collect and/or translate the information (code 999)

To be able to calculate with a minimum of accuracy the PI for a given month, the minutes of delay that are not attributed to any IATA code reason should not exceed 40% of the total minutes of pre-departure delay observed at the airport.
Finally, to be able to produce the annual figure, at least 10 months of valid data is requested by EUROCONTROL.

The share of unidentified delay reported by Prague was above 40% for 10 months in each year of RP3, preventing the calculation of this indicator.

All causes pre-departure delay

Prague is the only Czech airport subject to the monitoring of this indicator. The total (all causes) delay in the actual off block time at Prague in 2024 increased with respect to 2023 (LKPR: 2020: 8.30 min/dep.; 2021: 8.32 min/dep.; 2022: 17.92 min/dep.; 2023: 16.12 min/dep.; 2024: 18.51 min/dep.).

According to the Czech monitoring report: The main causes of the delay are: En-route delay - 19,34%; Airline delay - 15, 65%; Airport delay - 5,78%; Weather - B7-4,91%; Security & Immigration - 1,33% and Other - 52,98%. In the 2025 and 2026 season, a major reconstruction of the main RWY is underway and operational measures are being taken to improve the situation, which NSA closely monitors in regular meetings with the slot coordinator and with the airport operator. The measures described in last year’s report will continue to be further developed by the airport operator.

 
  • © European Union, 2025

  • Disclaimer

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission