AUC vs. DUC
In 2023, the terminal AUC was -9.8% (or -11.08 €2017) lower than the planned DUC. This results from the combination of significantly higher than planned TNSUs (+5.9%) and lower than planned terminal costs in real terms (-4.5%, or -4.5 M€2017). It should be noted that, in nominal terms, terminal costs were +4.9% (+5.1 M€) above the plan since the inflation index in 2023 was +11.8 p.p. higher than planned.
Terminal service units
The difference between actual and planned TNSUs (+5.9%) falls outside the ±2% dead band, but does not exceed the ±10% threshold foreseen in the traffic risk sharing mechanism. The resulting gain of additional terminal revenues is therefore shared between the ANSP and the airspace users .
Terminal costs by entity
Actual real terminal costs are -4.5% (-4.5 M€2017) lower than planned. This is the result of lower costs, in real terms, for the main ANSP, ENAIRE (-5.1%, or -4.9 M€2017) and the MET service provider (-0.5%) and higher costs for the NSA (+26.6%, or +0.4 M€2017).
Terminal costs for the main ANSP at charging zone level
Significantly lower than planned terminal costs in real terms for ENAIRE in 2023 (-5.1%, or -4.9 M€2017) result from:
- Lower staff costs (-3.3%) in real terms. It is noted that in nominal terms the costs were above the plan (+7.4%), reflecting a combination of increases driven by changes in national laws on Public Employees salary and on Social Security Scheme National Law as well as the introduction of Special Active Reserve (through Law 26/2022 of 19 December), which, among others, solves the problem of forced retirement of ATCOs at the age of 65.
- Significantly lower other operating costs (-14.3%),
- Significantly lower depreciation costs (-21.0%) reflecting “a lower percentage of asset base cost allocation in the TNC charging zone”, and
- Higher cost of capital (+3.3%), primarily reflecting the use of much higher average interest rate on debts to calculate WACC (3.3% vs 0.8% planned).