AUC vs. DUC
In 2023, the terminal AUC was +14.2% (or +230.33 NOK2017, +24.69 €2017) higher than the planned DUC. This results from the combination of significantly higher than planned terminal costs in real terms (+8.2%, or +31.9 MNOK2017, +3.4 M€2017) and significantly lower than planned TNSUs (-5.3%). It should be noted that actual inflation index in 2023 was +11.1 p.p. higher than planned.
Terminal service units
The difference between actual and planned TNSUs (-5.3%) falls outside the ±2% dead band, but does not exceed the ±10% threshold foreseen in the traffic risk sharing mechanism. The resulting loss of terminal revenues is therefore shared between the ANSP and the airspace users .
Terminal costs by entity
Actual real terminal costs are +8.2% (+3.4 M€2017) higher than planned. This is the result of higher costs for the main ANSP, Avinor (+8.2%, or +3.3 M€2017) and the MET service provider (+11.2%, or +0.1 M€2017) and lower costs for the NSA (-3.9%).
Terminal costs for the main ANSP at charging zone level
Significantly higher than planned terminal costs in real terms for Avinor in 2023 (+8.2%, or +3.3 M€2017) result from:
- Significantly higher staff costs (+36.6%), reflecting i) higher salary, pension and overtime costs and ii) a change in cost accounting methodology which “results in an increase in staff costs and a reduction in other operating costs accordingly”.
- Significantly lower other operating costs (-42.7%), primarily resulting from the change in cost accounting methodology as detailed above.
- Significantly higher depreciation (+9.7%),
- Significantly lower cost of capital (-22.7%) explained by “delay in projects, mainly related to the new OSL tower system.”
- Significantly higher deduction for VFR exempted flights (+7.0%).