AUC vs. DUC
In 2023, the terminal AUC was +4.1% (or +45.53 DKK2017, +6.12 €2017) higher than the planned DUC. This results from the combination of significantly lower than planned TNSUs (-6.6%) and lower than planned terminal costs in real terms (-2.8%, or -4.8 MDKK2017, -0.7 M€2017). Actual inflation index in 2023 was +10.5 p.p. higher than planned.
Terminal service units
The difference between actual and planned TNSUs (-6.6%) falls outside the ±2% dead band, but does not exceed the ±10% threshold foreseen in the traffic risk sharing mechanism. The resulting loss of terminal revenues is therefore shared between the ANSP and the airspace users.
Terminal costs by entity
Actual real terminal costs are -2.8% (-0.7 M€2017) lower than planned. This is the result of lower costs for the main ANSP, NAVIAIR (-2.9%, or -0.7 M€2017) and higher costs for the MET service provider (+15.5%, or +0.03 M€2017).
Terminal costs for the main ANSP at charging zone level
Lower than planned terminal costs in real terms for NAVIAIR in 2023 (-2.9%, or -0.7 M€2017) result from:
- Slightly lower staff costs (-1.5%), in real terms due to the inflation index impact (+10.5 p.p.). In nominal terms staff costs are above the plan (+8.3%), explained by “high level of extra shifts, and not realised effects from the implementation of the Strategy”.
- Significantly lower other operating costs (-6.4%) in real terms due to the impact of inflation index. In nominal terms other operating costs are above the plan (+2.9%), which result from higher energy and training costs.
- Significantly lower depreciation (-9.9%), reflecting “fewer and delayed investments and later deployment”;
- Significantly higher cost of capital (+15.8%), reflecting “higher interest rate on loan and increased asset base”;
- No deduction through exceptional costs which was included in the PP to reduce the level of terminal cost-base.