AUC vs. DUC
In the combined year 2020-2021, the terminal AUC for TCZ1 was lower by -16.0% (-123.61 PLN or -29.05€2017) comparing to the DUC. This was in particular the effect of the lower than planned terminal costs in real terms (-17.4%, -13.2 MPLN2017 or -3.1 M€2017) for TCZ1.
Terminal service units
The difference between actual and planned TNSU for the zone (-1.6%) is within the ±2% dead-band, which results in a loss borne by ANSPs.
Terminal costs by entity
Actual terminal costs are -17.4% lower than planned (-3.1 M€2017) which is mainly driven by the lower costs for PANSA (-18.8% or -3.1 M€2017). Slightly lower actual costs are observed in the IMWM (METSP), -0.8%. For the NSA costs are higher by +4.8%.
Terminal costs for the main ANSP at charging zone level
The lower than planned terminal costs for TCZ1 in real terms for PANSA (-18.8%, or -3.1 M€2017) result from:
- lower en route staff costs for TCZ1 (by -19.6% or -2.5 M€2017), “resulting from a number of factors, including evolution of provisions also those for one-off elements of staff benefits reflected in the RP3 determined cost”, lower remuneration costs (due to lower employment level) and lower actual level of bonuses and rewards;
- lower terminal other operating costs for the zone (by -36.1% or -0.7 M€2017), resulting from costs cutting measures in 2021;
- higher, by +1.0% (or +0.02 M€2017) depreciation costs due to the difference in the useful life of some assets;
- lower, by -0.9% cost of capital due to slightly lower value of asset base.