• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • Investments
    • SES RP3

    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • About
  • Download
  • Data Portal
  • Publications
    • Year report
      • RP3
      • 2024 ✓
      • 2023
      • 2022
      • 2021
      • 2020

    • Romania
    • Overview
      • Contextual information
      • Traffic
      • Safety
      • Environment
      • Capacity
      • Cost-efficiency

    • Safety
      • PRB monitoring
      • EoSM
      • Safety occurrences
        • Runway incursions
        • Separation minima infringements
        • Occurrences reporting
      • ASDRS

    • Environment
      • PRB monitoring
      • En route performance
        • Horizontal flight efficiency
      • Terminal performance
        • AXOT & ASMA
        • CDO
      • CIV-MIL

    • Capacity
      • PRB monitoring
      • En route performance
        • En route ATFM delay
        • Other indicators
      • Terminal performance
        • Arrival ATFM delay
        • Other performance indicators

    • Cost-efficiency
      • PRB monitoring
      • En route CZ
        • Unit cost
        • AUCU
        • Regulatory Result
      • Terminal CZ
        • Unit cost
        • AUCU
        • Regulatory Result

    Cost-efficiency - Romania

    Download Report

    Terminal charging zone

    Unit cost (KPI#1)

    Actual and determined data
    Total costs - nominal (M€) 2020-2021 2022 2023 2024
    Actual costs 35 23 29 30
    Determined costs 36 21 24 25
    Difference costs -1 2 4 5
    Inflation assumptions 2020-2021 2022 2023 2024
    Determined inflation rate NA 9.3% 4.0% 3.0%
    Determined inflation index NA 125.9 130.9 134.8
    Actual inflation rate NA 12.0% 9.7% 5.8%
    Actual inflation index NA 129 141.5 149.7
    Difference inflation index (p.p.) NA +3.1 +10.6 +14.9
    Focus on unit cost

    AUC vs. DUC

    In 2024, the terminal AUC was +5.6% (or +65.40 RON2017, +14.32 €2017) higher than the planned DUC. This results from the combination of significantly higher than planned terminal costs in real terms (+7.4%, or +6.4 MRON2017, +1.4 M€2017) and higher than planned TNSUs (+1.7%). It should be noted that the actual inflation index in 2024 was +14.9 p.p. higher than planned.

    Terminal service units

    The difference between actual and planned TNSUs (+1.7%) falls inside the ±2% dead-band. Hence, the gain of additional terminal revenues is kept by the ANSPs (see items 10 to 13).

    Terminal costs by entity

    The 2024 actual real terminal ANS costs are +7.4% (+1.4 M€2017) higher than planned. This is the result of higher than planned costs for the main ANSP, ROMATSA (+7.8%, or +1.5 M€2017) and lower than planned costs for the NSA (-29.6%, or -0.1 M€2017).

    Terminal costs for the main ANSP at charging zone level

    The significantly higher than planned terminal costs in real terms for ROMATSA in 2024 (+7.8%, or +1.5 M€2017) result from:
    - Significantly higher than planned staff costs (+10.4%), mainly due to “an increase of pension costs and compensation of personnel with inflation for meeting the capacity targets”.
    - Significantly higher than planned other operating costs (+8.6%), due to “the recognition of operating costs related to adjustments for the impairment of current assets - receivables”.
    - Significantly lower than planned depreciation (-25.5%), mainly due to the postponement of investment finalisation (i.e. Modernization of A-SMGCS at DSNA Bucharest, Advanced Tower Messaging).
    - Slightly lower than planned cost of capital (-0.6%), mainly due to the above delayed investment “(…) partially offset by increasing interest rate for the contracted loan”.
    - Lower than planned deduction for VFR exempted flights (-29.7%).

    RP3 summary

    When considering the whole of RP3 (2020-2024) for Romania terminal charging zone , actual TNSUs are -2.8% lower than planned, while actual costs in real terms are +3.8% higher than the determined costs (some +15.1 MRON2017 or +3.3 M€2017). As a result, the weighted average actual unit cost over RP3 (1 471.02 RON2017 or 322.15 €2017) is +6.7% higher than planned in the PP (1 378.36 RON2017 or 301.85 €2017).

    Actual unit cost incurred by the users (AUCU) (PI#1)

    AUCU components (€/SU) – 2024
    Components of the AUCU in 2024 €/SU
    DUC 308.45
    Inflation adjustment 30.66
    Cost exempt from cost-sharing -2.25
    Traffic risk sharing adjustment 0.00
    Traffic adj. (costs not TRS) -0.32
    Finantial incentives 1.51
    Modulation of charges 0.00
    Cross-financing 0.00
    Other revenues 0.00
    Application of lower unit rate 0.00
    Total adjustments 29.59
    AUCU 338.04
    AUCU vs. DUC + 9.6%
    Cost exempt from cost sharing by item - 2024 €'000 €/SU
    New and existing investments -278.4 -3.70
    Competent authorities and qualified entities costs -53.8 -0.71
    Eurocontrol costs 0.0 0.00
    Pension costs 152.8 2.03
    Interest on loans 9.8 0.13
    Changes in law 0.0 0.00
    Total cost exempt from cost risk sharing -169.6 -2.25
    Focus on AUCU

    The actual terminal unit cost incurred by airspace users (AUCU) in respect of activities performed in 2024 (1 680.73 RON or 338.04 €) is +9.6% higher than the nominal DUC (1 533.60 RON or 308.45 €). The difference between these two figures (+147.13 RON/SU or +29.59 €/SU) is due to:
    - the positive inflation adjustment resulting from higher than planned inflation (+152.42 RON/SU or +30.66 €/SU);
    - the impact of adjustments resulting from the costs exempted from cost sharing mechanism (-11.20 RON/SU or -2.25 €/SU);
    - the deduction of the traffic adjustment (-1.57 RON/SU or -0.32 €/SU) for the costs not subject to traffic risk sharing; and
    - the financial incentives (+7.48 RON/SU or +1.51 €/SU).
    The share of the regulatory result (see items 10 to 13) in the AUCU (before the deduction of other revenues) is -5.0%.

    Regulatory result (RR)

    Focus on regulatory result

    ROMATSA net loss on activity in the Romania terminal charging zone in the year 2024

    ROMATSA reported a net loss of -8.8 MRON, as a combination of a loss of -11.2 MRON arising from the cost sharing mechanism, with a gain of +1.8 MRON arising from the traffic risk sharing mechanism and a gain of +0.6 MRON relating to financial incentives.

    ROMATSA overall regulatory result (RR) for the terminal activity

    Ex-post, the overall RR taking into account the net loss from the terminal activity mentioned above (-8.8 MRON) and the actual RoE (+2.4 MRON) amounts to -6.4 MRON (-5.1% of the terminal revenues). The resulting ex-post rate of return on equity is -19.7%.

    RP3 summary

    When considering the whole of RP3 (2020-2024), ROMATSA generated a cumulative loss in respect of cost sharing of -19.3 MRON, as actual total costs for RP3 were higher than planned. The traffic risk sharing mechanism generated loss of -7.6 MRON. Adding the gain of +1.1 MRON to be retained by the ATSP in respect of financial incentives and the actual RoE (+14.7 MRON over RP3) leads to an overall regulatory result of -11.1 MRON, which corresponds to an average ex-post rate of return on equity of -6.8% (compared to 8.9% initially planned in the PP).

     
    • © European Union, 2025

    • Disclaimer

    • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission