• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • Investments
    • SES RP3

    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • About
  • Download
  • Data Portal
  • Publications
  1. Cost-efficiency
  • Year report
    • RP3
    • 2024 ✓
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020

  • Portugal
  • Overview
    • Contextual information
    • Traffic
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Capacity
    • Cost-efficiency

  • Safety
    • PRB monitoring
    • EoSM
    • Safety occurrences
      • Runway incursions
      • Separation minima infringements
      • Occurrences reporting
    • ASDRS

  • Environment
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • Horizontal flight efficiency
    • Terminal performance
      • AXOT & ASMA
      • CDO
    • CIV-MIL

  • Capacity
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route performance
      • En route ATFM delay
      • Other indicators
    • Terminal performance
      • Arrival ATFM delay
      • Other performance indicators

  • Cost-efficiency
    • PRB monitoring
    • En route CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result
    • Terminal CZ
      • Unit cost
      • AUCU
      • Regulatory Result

Cost-efficiency - Portugal

Download Report

PRB monitoring

▪ The en route 2024 actual unit cost of Portugal was 31.82€2017, -16% lower than the determined unit cost (37.87€2017). The terminal 2024 actual unit cost was 121.93€2017, -16% lower than the determined unit cost (144.89€2017).

▪ The en route 2024 actual service units of Portugal (4.5M) were +16% higher than the determined service units (3.9M).

▪ The en route 2024 actual total costs were -3.6M€2017, (-2.5%) lower than determined, with all cost categories registering lower-than-planned costs. This difference is mainly driven by lower staff costs (-1.8M€2017, or -1.9%) for NAV Portugal. However, in nominal terms, staff costs were +10.4% higher than planned, mainly due to overtime resulting from higher traffic.

▪ NAV Portugal costs of investments were 18M€2017 in 2024 for both en route and terminal charging zones, -3.9% lower than determined (19M€2017). The difference is mainly resulting from lower cost of capital, due to lower net book value of fixed assets.

▪ The en route actual unit cost incurred by users in 2024 was 37.71€ (-5.2% lower than the 2024 DUC), while the terminal actual unit cost incurred by users in 2024 was 147.40€ (-3.6% lower than the 2024 DUC). Both these changes were mostly led by the effect of higher traffic than expected.

En route charging zone

Unit cost (KPI#1)

Actual and determined data
Total costs - nominal (M€) 2020-2021 2022 2023 2024
Actual costs 234 130 165 166
Determined costs 233 139 150 155
Difference costs 1 -9 15 12
Inflation assumptions 2020-2021 2022 2023 2024
Determined inflation rate NA 1.2% 1.3% 1.4%
Determined inflation index NA 103.6 104.9 106.4
Actual inflation rate NA 8.1% 5.3% 2.7%
Actual inflation index NA 110.7 116.6 119.7
Difference inflation index (p.p.) NA +7.1 +11.7 +13.4
Focus on unit cost

AUC vs. DUC

In 2024, the en route AUC was -16.0% (or -6.05 €2017) lower than the planned DUC. This results from the combination of significantly higher than planned TSUs (+16.1%) and lower than planned en route costs in real terms (-2.5%, or -3.6 M€2017). It should be noted that the actual inflation index in 2024 was +13.4 p.p. higher than planned.

En route service units

The difference between actual and planned TSUs (+16.1%) falls outside the ±10% threshold foreseen in the traffic risk sharing mechanism. The resulting gain of additional en route revenues is therefore shared between the ANSP and the airspace users (see the main ANSP gain in Box 11).

En route costs by entity

Actual real en route costs are -2.5% (-3.6 M€2017) lower than planned. This is the result of lower costs for the main ANSP, NAV Portugal (-1.8%, or -2.3 M€2017), the NSA/EUROCONTROL (-10.3%, or -1.0 M€2017) and the METSP (-10.5%, or -0.6 M€2017) and higher costs for the other ANSP (Portugal Continental SAR, +5.2%, or +0.3 M€2017).

En route costs for the main ANSP at charging zone level

Lower than planned en route costs in real terms for NAV Portugal in 2024 (-1.8%, or -2.3 M€2017) result from:
- Lower staff costs (-1.9%), due to the impact of inflation index (+13.4 p.p.) since in nominal terms, staff costs, were above planned by +10.4%. Although positively impacted by lower annual defined benefit pension costs than expected, staff costs, were higher than planned in nominal terms, “mainly due to overtime needed to provide services to traffic 16% above planned”.
- Lower other operating costs (-1.6%), due to the impact of inflation index since, in nominal terms, other operating costs were significantly higher than planned (+10.7%).
- Slightly lower depreciation (-0.4%).
- Significantly lower cost of capital (-8.3%), due to lower net book value of fixed assets.

RP3 summary

When considering the whole of RP3 (2020-2024) for Portugal Continental en route charging zone, actual TSUs are +11.3% higher than planned, while actual costs in real terms are -2.6% lower than the determined costs (some -16.7 M€2017). As a result, the weighted average actual unit cost over RP3 (40.28 €2017) is -12.4% lower than planned in the PP (45.99 €2017).

Actual unit cost incurred by the users (AUCU) (PI#1)

AUCU components (€/SU) – 2024
Components of the AUCU in 2024 €/SU
DUC 39.79
Inflation adjustment 3.47
Cost exempt from cost-sharing -1.24
Traffic risk sharing adjustment -3.60
Traffic adj. (costs not TRS) -0.56
Finantial incentives -0.15
Modulation of charges 0.00
Cross-financing 0.00
Other revenues 0.00
Application of lower unit rate 0.00
Total adjustments -2.08
AUCU 37.71
AUCU vs. DUC -5.2%
Cost exempt from cost sharing by item - 2024 €'000 €/SU
New and existing investments -1,412.9 -0.31
Competent authorities and qualified entities costs -62.5 -0.01
Eurocontrol costs -906.0 -0.20
Pension costs -3,202.6 -0.71
Interest on loans 0.0 0.00
Changes in law 0.0 0.00
Total cost exempt from cost risk sharing -5,583.9 -1.24
Focus on AUCU

The actual en route unit cost incurred by airspace users (AUCU) in respect of activities performed in 2024 (37.71 €) is -5.2% lower than the nominal DUC (39.79 €). The difference between these two figures (-2.08 €/SU) is due to:
- the positive inflation adjustment resulting from higher than planned inflation (+3.47 €/SU);
- the impact of adjustments resulting from the costs exempted from cost sharing mechanism (-1.24 €/SU);
- the deduction of the traffic risk sharing adjustments (-3.60 €/SU);
- the deduction of the traffic adjustment (-0.56 €/SU) for the costs not subject to traffic risk sharing; and
- financial incentives (-0.15 €/SU).
The share of the regulatory result (see items 10 to 14) in the AUCU (before the deduction of other revenues) is 3.8%.

Regulatory result (RR)

Focus on regulatory result

NAV Portugal net gain/loss on activity in the Portugal Continental en route charging zone in the year 2024

NAV Portugal reported a net gain of +4.0 M€, as a combination of a loss of -1.2 M€ arising from the cost sharing mechanism, with a gain of +5.9 M€ arising from the traffic risk sharing mechanism and a loss of -0.7 M€ relating to financial incentives.

NAV Portugal overall regulatory result (RR) for the en route activity

Ex-post, the overall RR taking into account the net gain from the en route activity mentioned above (+4.0 M€) and the actual RoE (+2.6 M€) amounts to +6.6 M€ (4.4% of the en route revenues). The resulting ex-post rate of return on equity is 10.8%, which is higher than the 4.2% planned in the PP.

RP3 summary

When considering the whole of RP3 (2020-2024), NAV Portugal generated a cumulative loss in respect of cost sharing of -5.4 M€, as actual total costs for RP3 were higher than planned. The traffic risk sharing mechanism generated gain of +20.2 M€. Adding the loss of -1.3 M€ to be retained by the ATSP in respect of financial incentives and the actual RoE (+11.1 M€ over RP3) leads to an overall regulatory result of +24.6 M€, which corresponds to an average ex-post return on equity of 10.4% (compared to 4.7% initially planned in the PP).

 
  • © European Union, 2025

  • Disclaimer

  • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission