AUC vs. DUC
In the combined year 2020-2021, the terminal AUC was +1.2% (or +32.83 NOK2017, +3.52 €2017) higher than the planned DUC. This results from the combination of slightly lower than planned TNSUs (-0.9%) and slightly higher than planned terminal costs in real terms (+0.3%, or +2.0 MNOK2017, +0.2 M€2017).
Terminal service units
The difference between actual and planned TNSUs (-0.9%) falls within the ±2% dead band. Hence the resulting loss in terminal revenue is borne by the ANSPs.
Terminal costs by entity
Actual real terminal costs are +0.3% (or +0.2 M€2017) higher than planned. This is driven by the MET service provider (+18.9%, or +0.3 M€2017), while the actual costs of the main ANSP (Avinor) and the NSA are close to the determined costs (-0.1% and -2.8%, respectively).
Terminal costs for the main ANSP at charging zone level
The slightly lower than planned terminal costs in real terms for Avinor (-0.1%, or -0.1 M€2017) result from the combination of:
- slightly higher staff costs (+0.9%);
- lower other operating costs (-3.8%), mainly due to cost-savings in travel expenses and external support;
- slightly higher depreciation and cost of capital (+2.8% and +0.8%, respectively), due to the higher cost of investment relating to the new radar at Oslo airport and IT equipment; and,
- slightly lower than planned deduction for VFR exempted flights (-0.6%).