AUC vs. DUC
In the combined year 2020-2021, the AUC for Malta TCZ was lower than the planned DUC (-8.4%, or -25.26€). This results from the combination of slightly higher than planned TNSUs (+0.8%) and lower than planned terminal costs in real terms (-7.7%, or -0.8 M€2017).
Terminal service units
The difference between actual and planned TNSUs (+0.8%) falls within the ±2% dead band. Hence, the resulting gain of 0.1 M€ is entirely retained by the main ANSP.
Terminal costs by entity
Actual real terminal costs for 2020-2021 in the Maltese TCZ are -7.7% (-0.8 M€2017) lower than planned. This reflects lower than planned costs for all the entities in the TCZ: the main ANSP - MATS (-9.1%, or -0.8 M€2017), other ANSP – MIA (-0.8%) and the costs for the NSA (-0.7%).
Terminal costs for the main ANSP at charging zone level
The lower than planned terminal costs in real terms for MATS in 2020-2021 reflects a combination of:
- lower staff costs (-1.9%);
- much lower other operating costs (-19.8%), which are understood to reflect cost-cutting measures implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic;
- lower depreciation costs (-10.9%) attributable to the fact that MATS had suspended all CAPEX projects during the pandemic; and,
- significantly lower cost of capital (-16.1%), which is understood to reflect lower than planned asset base.