• Home
  • SES view
  • State view
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • MUAC
    • Netherlands
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
  • NM View
  • About
  • Download
  • Publications
    • Year report
      • 2023
      • 2022 ✓
      • 2021
      • 2020

    • Malta
    • Overview
      • Contextual information
      • Traffic
      • Safety
      • Environment
      • Capacity
      • Cost-efficiency

    • Safety
      • PRB monitoring
      • EoSM
      • Occurrences

    • Environment
      • PRB monitoring
      • En route performance
        • Horizontal flight efficiency
      • Terminal performance
        • AXOT & ASMA
        • CDO
      • CIV-MIL

    • Capacity
      • PRB monitoring
      • En route performance
        • En route ATFM delay
        • Other indicators
      • Terminal performance
        • Arrival ATFM delay
        • Other performance indicators

    • Cost-efficiency
      • PRB monitoring
      • En route CZ
        • Unit cost
        • AUCU
        • Regulatory Result
      • Terminal CZ
        • Unit cost
        • AUCU
        • Regulatory Result

    Cost-efficiency - Malta

    Download Report

    Terminal charging zone

    Unit cost (KPI#1)

    Actual and determined data
    Total costs - nominal (M€) 2020-2021 2022 2023 2024
    Actual costs 9 5 NA NA
    Determined costs 10 6 6 7
    Difference costs −2 −1 NA NA
    Inflation assumptions 2020-2021 2022 2023 2024
    Determined inflation rate NA 4.7% 2.8% 2.1%
    Determined inflation index NA 109.7 112.8 115.1
    Actual inflation rate NA 6.1% NA NA
    Actual inflation index NA 111.2 NA NA
    Difference inflation index (p.p.) NA +1.5 NA NA
    Focus on unit cost

    AUC vs. DUC

    In 2022, the terminal AUC was -34.0% (or -58.95 €2017) lower than the planned DUC. This results from the combination of significantly lower than planned terminal costs in real terms (-36.6%, or -2.0 M€2017) and lower than planned TNSUs (-3.9%).

    Terminal service units

    The difference between the 2022 actual and planned TNSUs (-3.9%) falls outside the ±2% dead band, but does not exceed the ±10% threshold foreseen in the traffic risk sharing mechanism. The resulting loss of terminal revenues is therefore shared between the ATSP and the airspace users, with the ATSP (MATS) bearing a loss of -0.1 M€2017.

    Terminal costs by entity

    The 2022 actual real terminal costs are -36.6% (-2.0 M€2017) lower than planned. This is the result of lower costs for the main ANSP, MATS (-42.6%, or -1.9 M€2017), the other ANSP (MIA, -10.1%, or -0.05 M€2017) and the NSA (-2.1%, or 0.01 M€2017).

    Terminal costs for the main ANSP at charging zone level

    Significantly lower than planned terminal costs in real terms for MATS in 2022 (-42.6%, or -1.9 M€2017) result from:
    - Significantly lower than planned staff costs (-38.2%, or -0.9 M€2017), “due to the fact that during 2022 some ATCOs obtained the area licence and a portion of their wages was apportioned to en route.”
    - Significantly lower than planned other operating costs (-58.0%, or -0.8 M€2017),
    - Lower than planned depreciation costs (-30.7%, or -0.2 M€2017), “due to the fact that the actual realised CAPEX was much lower than anticipated.”,
    - Lower than planned cost of capital (-32.6%, or -0.03 M€2017), mainly due to significantly lower asset base.

    Actual unit cost incurred by the users (AUCU) (PI#1)

    AUCU components (€/SU) – 2022
    Components of the AUCU in 2022 €/SU
    DUC 185.71
    Inflation adjustment 1.93
    Cost exempt from cost-sharing −17.69
    Traffic risk sharing adjustment 2.33
    Traffic adj. (costs not TRS) 0.70
    Finantial incentives 0.00
    Modulation of charges 0.00
    Cross-financing 0.00
    Other revenues 0.00
    Application of lower unit rate 0.00
    Total adjustments −12.72
    AUCU 172.99
    AUCU vs. DUC −6.9%
    Cost exempt from cost sharing by item - 2022 €'000 €/SU
    New and existing investments −517.9 −17.38
    Competent authorities and qualified entities costs −9.0 −0.30
    Eurocontrol costs 0.0 0.00
    Pension costs 0.0 0.00
    Interest on loans 0.0 0.00
    Changes in law 0.0 0.00
    Total cost exempt from cost risk sharing −526.9 −17.69
    Focus on AUCU

    The actual terminal unit cost incurred by airspace users (AUCU) in respect of the activities performed in 2022 (190.37 €) is +2.5% higher than the nominal DUC (185.71 €). The difference between these two figures (+4.66 €/SU) is due to:
    - the positive inflation adjustment resulting from higher than planned inflation (+1.93 €/SU);
    - the impact of adjustments resulting from the costs exempted from cost-sharing mechanism (-0.30 €/SU);
    - the addition of the traffic risk sharing adjustments (+2.33 €/SU); and
    - the addition of the traffic adjustment (+0.70 €/SU) for the costs not subject to traffic risk sharing.
    The share of the regulatory result in the AUCU (before the deduction of other revenues) is 36.7%.

    Regulatory result (RR)

    Focus on regulatory result

    MATS net gain on activity in the Malta terminal charging zone in the year 2022

    MATS reported a net gain of +2.0 M€, as a combination of a gain of +2.1 M€ arising from the cost sharing mechanism, with a loss of -0.1 M€ arising from the traffic risk sharing mechanism.

    MATS overall regulatory results (RR) for the terminal activity

    Ex-post, the overall RR taking into account the net gain from the terminal activity mentioned above (+2.0 M€) and the actual RoE (+0.1 M€) amounts to +2.0 M€ (42.9% of the terminal revenues). The resulting ex-post rate of return on equity is 115.8%, which is higher than the 4.0% planned in the PP.

     
    • © European Union, 2024

    • Disclaimer

    • [email protected]

    • Website published by EUROCONTROL for the European Commission