AUC vs. DUC
The AUC was -4.1% (or -162.86 SEK2017, -16.91 €2017) lower than the planned DUC resulting from the combination of higher than planned TNSUs (+3.9%) and slightly lower than planned terminal costs in real terms (-0.4%, or -1.6 MSEK2017, -0.2 M€2017).
Terminal service units
The difference between actual and planned TNSUs (+3.9%) falls outside the ±2% dead band. Hence the resulting additional terminal revenue is shared between the ANSPs and airspace users, with the main ANSP (LFV) retaining an amount of 8.4 MSEK (0.8 M€).
Terminal costs by entity
Actual real terminal costs are slightly lower than planned (-0.4% or -0.2 M€2017). This is driven by the other ANSP, Swedavia (-3.8%, or -0.4 M€2017) and MET SP (-7.7%, or -0.1 M€2017), while the actual costs of the main ANSP, LFV are slightly higher than planned (+0.9%, or +0.3 M€2017). NSA costs are close to the planned costs (-0.5%).
Terminal costs for the main ANSP at charging zone level
The slightly higher than planned terminal costs in real terms for LFV in 2020-2021 reflect a combination of:
- lower staff costs (-1.5%); due to lower than planned pension costs. In addition, “staff costs were reduced by the revenues for staff participating in projects or other parts not financed by terminal charges”;
- significantly higher other operating costs (+14.7%); mainly due to higher training costs;
- no depreciation costs are reported for LFV since these costs are fully borne by the other ANSP (Swedavia, airport operator) owning the CNS infrastructure at Arlanda;
- nevertheless, LFV reports the cost of capital (computed on costs exempt from cost sharing from RP2), which turned out higher than planned (+6.2%); linked with a higher interest rate on debt used to compute the cost of capital.