Annual Monitoring Report 2025 - Luxembourg

Download Report

Contextual information

FAB draft revised performance plan currently under assessment

List of ACCs   0





No of airports in the scope of the performance plan

≥80’K     0
<80’K      1

Exchange rate (1 EUR=) 

2022: 1 EUR
2025: 1 EUR

Share of Union-wide traffic (TSUs) 2025  2.0%

Share of Union-wide en route costs 2025  3.4%

Share en route / terminal costs 2025  93% / 7%

En route charging zone(s)

Belgium-Luxembourg

Terminal charging zone(s)

Luxembourg

Main ANSP 

• ANA Lux

Other ANSPs 

• skeyes
• MUAC

MET Providers 

–

Traffic (En route traffic zone)

  • Belgium-Luxembourg recorded 1,270K actual IFR movements in 2025, +5.8% compared to 2024 (1,200K).

  • Actual 2025 IFR movements were +1.7% above the plan (1,249K).

  • Actual 2025 IFR movements were +1.7% above the actual 2019 level (1,249K).


  • Belgium-Luxembourg recorded 2,733K actual service units in 2025, +8.7% compared to 2024 (2,514K).

  • Actual 2025 service units were +1.5% above the plan (2,693K).

  • Actual 2025 service units are +4.3% above the actual 2019 level (2,620K).

Safety (Main ANSP)

  • In 2025, ANA LUX achieved the planned maturity levels set out in its performance plan for three out of five components of the EoSM. The components where ANA LUX missed the planned levels were Safety Policy and Objectives and Safety Risk Management. ANA LUX scored A for the Safety Policy and Objectives and Safety Risk Management and needs significant improvement in order to reach the targets by the end of RP4.

  • Luxembourg reported zero runway incursions (RI) during 2025, whereas in 2024, 1 RI was reported. Luxembourg is below the Union-wide average rate.

  • The rate of separation minima infringements (SMIs) at State level was 8.76 and equal to the SMIs at ANSP level. Both indicators were above the Union-wide average.

  • When comparing to 2024, the rate of SMIs has decreased significantly at both State level and at ANSP level.

Capacity (Member State)

  • Luxembourg registered an average airport arrival ATFM delay of 0.15 minutes per flight in 2025, thus achieving the local target of 0.2 minutes. Compared to 2024, average arrival ATFM delays in Luxembourg were -0.40 minutes per flight lower in 2025.

  • The main drivers of delays were weather, accounting for 0.13 of the total delays, and other non-ATC causes, responsible for 0.02.

Cost-efficiency (En route/Terminal charging zone(s))



  • The en route 2025 actual unit cost of Belgium-Luxembourg was 91.28€2022, -5.9% lower than the determined unit cost (97.00€2022). The terminal 2025 actual unit cost of Luxembourg was 325.95€2022, +7.6% higher than the determined unit cost (302.88€2022).

  • The en route 2025 actual service units (2.73M) were +1.5% higher than the determined service units (2.69M).

  • The en route 2025 actual total costs were -11.7M€2022 (-4.5%) lower than determined with all cost categories registering lower-than-planned costs, except staff costs. The gap is mainly due to lower other operating costs of Skeyes (-9.2M€2022, or -27.6%). The NSA attributed this decrease to lower maintenance and external support costs compared to planned.

  • A deviation from the criteria to achieve capacity targets was considered justified for Belgium-Luxembourg. Actual costs for the measures necessary to achieve those targets were lower than determined (-1.8M€2022, or -9.7%), mainly due to lower depreciation (-1.8M€2022, or -83.5%) than planned.

  • The en route actual unit cost incurred by users in 2025 was 102.11€ (-3.2% below the 2025 DUC). The terminal actual unit cost incurred by users was 215.63€ (-25.1% below the 2025 DUC) for Belgium and 275.46€ (-14.9% below the 2025 DUC) for Luxembourg. The difference between the AUCU and the DUC for the terminal charging zones is mainly driven by other revenues.